2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04319-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue performance of endodontically treated premolars restored with direct and indirect cuspal coverage restorations utilizing fiber-reinforced cores

Abstract: Objectives The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the fatigue survival and fracture behavior of endodontically treated (ET) premolars restored with different types of post-core and cuspal coverage restorations. Materials and methods MOD cavities were prepared on 108 extracted maxillary premolars. During the endodontic treatment, all teeth were instrumented with rotary files (ProTaper Universal) to the same apical enlargement (F2) and were obtura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study focused on the possible effects of FRC system choice and the remaining bone level on the fatigue resistance of lower dissected molar teeth that were restored with direct, inlay-retained FRC bridges. As in the recent studies carried out by the authors, cyclic loading was used instead of static load-to-fracture testing in this study [ 23 , 30 , 31 ]. When testing the tooth-restoration units, cycling loading is considered to be more suitable to model oral clinical conditions than static testing, as during cyclic loading repetitive forces are generated, which is closer to the conditions of chewing [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study focused on the possible effects of FRC system choice and the remaining bone level on the fatigue resistance of lower dissected molar teeth that were restored with direct, inlay-retained FRC bridges. As in the recent studies carried out by the authors, cyclic loading was used instead of static load-to-fracture testing in this study [ 23 , 30 , 31 ]. When testing the tooth-restoration units, cycling loading is considered to be more suitable to model oral clinical conditions than static testing, as during cyclic loading repetitive forces are generated, which is closer to the conditions of chewing [ 31 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the manufacturer’s instructions, fibers should be covered with particulate-filled composites (PFCs) from all directions to avoid moisture uptake from the oral cavity. Yet, more and more studies show that the fracture and fatigue resistance of a restoration can be improved when the flowable SFRC is not covered with PFC [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ]. Thus, the question arises whether SFRCs could be utilized to improve an FRC bridge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bi-layered composite restorations where flowable SFRC is placed at the cavity bottom as a substructure and veneered with PFC (packable or flowable) have been the recommended technique for restoring stress-bearing posterior teeth as they provided enhancement in load-bearing capacity when tested in vitro [ 9 , 16 ]. In this scenario, surface roughness, surface free-energy, material reactivity, viscosity, the presence of an oxygen inhibition layer, and the increment material employed all have an influence on the bonding between two composite layers [ 19 , 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the great advantage of this test is that the samples can be tested within a reasonable time (hours), so in terms of time consumption and also clinical relevance, it is positioned between the static load-to-fracture test and the classical dynamic loading test [62,63].…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mechanical testing was carried out in two phases. In the first phase (pretesting), the restorationtooth units were firstly submitted to an accelerated fatigue-testing protocol [62,63,66,67,68] performed with a dynamic testing machine (Instron ElektroPlus E3000, Norwood, MA, USA) (Figure 19). Cyclic isometric loading was applied on the connector part of the splinted teeth units with a 5 mm wide, round ended metallic tip.…”
Section: Mechanical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%