2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04363-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue-related modulation of low-frequency common drive to motor units

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reference to baseline force fluctuations, both groups exhibited postexercise loss of force precision control, as indicated by the comparably greater FF-RMS T1/T0 (Table 2). The increase in force fluctuations did not vary by group, indicating a tendency of neuromuscular fatigue (42) in relation to increases in discharge variability for shifts in low-frequency common drive to MUs (43). Compared with the baseline EMG, both groups also demonstrated a comparably decreasing trend of EMG amplitude (EMG-RMS T1/T0 ) in the postcontraction stage (Table 3), concomitant with a decline in gross nervous system output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reference to baseline force fluctuations, both groups exhibited postexercise loss of force precision control, as indicated by the comparably greater FF-RMS T1/T0 (Table 2). The increase in force fluctuations did not vary by group, indicating a tendency of neuromuscular fatigue (42) in relation to increases in discharge variability for shifts in low-frequency common drive to MUs (43). Compared with the baseline EMG, both groups also demonstrated a comparably decreasing trend of EMG amplitude (EMG-RMS T1/T0 ) in the postcontraction stage (Table 3), concomitant with a decline in gross nervous system output.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It is known that the central nervous system lowers the recruitment threshold of MU in compensation for diminution of the force contributions of individual MU so that muscle force output can be sustained via increasing recruitment of MU (46,47). Hence, the scenario implies that the central nervous system relatively raises the recruitment threshold of MU when the twitch force of MU is potentiated with the photobiomodulation effect for rapid ATP synthesis in the after-recovery stage (32,43). Probably because the regulation of the recruitment threshold and rate coding of MU were independent processes (48), we noted an insignificant increase in discharge rate in the LLL group during the recovery stage relative to that of the sham group ( P = 0.094; Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the level of force that was reached in each trapezoidal trajectory did not differ across conditions, it could be argued that increase in MU DR after acute exercises might be related to muscle fatigue ( Macaluso et al, 2000 ), assuming that active MUs would require to compensate with greater DR to achieve equivalent force outputs. However, several authors reported that in presence of fatigue, particularly following submaximal tasks (including 20% MVIC), the mean discharge rate of MUs significantly decreased ( McManus et al, 2015 ; Hwang et al, 2020 ). It has been suggested that in presence of fatigue, earlier-recruited MUs are selectively inhibited and decrease their DR, while the concurrent increase in the excitation to the motoneuron pool leads to the recruitment of new MUs to sustain the force output ( Enoka et al, 1989 ; Stewart et al, 2011 ; McManus et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These patients rely on an alternative compensation strategy, which involves enhancing the acceleration rate of progressively shortening inter-spike intervals in the remaining low-threshold motor units to generate force ( Figure 5 ). This compensatory rate coding may facilitate the fusion of twitch forces ( Hwang et al, 2020 ), but force precision control of increasing force without ample recruitment of high-threshold motor units is still inferior compared to their healthy counterparts ( Table 3 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%