2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatigue threshold and crack growth rate of adhesively bonded joints as a function of load/displacement ratio

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That is, for a given ΔG, the value of da/dN is actually observed to decrease as the value of the Rratio increases. This behaviour is also seen in the experimentally-determined da/dN versus ΔG curves presented in [10,34,35], see . In these figures the results shown are from Mode I DCB fatigue tests, apart from the data shown in Figure 7 where fatigue results [10] from asymmetric double-cantilever beam (ADCB) specimens consisting of aluminiumalloy substrates bonded using a single-part, heat-cured, toughened-epoxy adhesive are given.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That is, for a given ΔG, the value of da/dN is actually observed to decrease as the value of the Rratio increases. This behaviour is also seen in the experimentally-determined da/dN versus ΔG curves presented in [10,34,35], see . In these figures the results shown are from Mode I DCB fatigue tests, apart from the data shown in Figure 7 where fatigue results [10] from asymmetric double-cantilever beam (ADCB) specimens consisting of aluminiumalloy substrates bonded using a single-part, heat-cured, toughened-epoxy adhesive are given.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…These observations, coupled with the introduction by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of a slow crack-growth approach to certifying composite and adhesively bonded structures [4], has led to a renewed interest [1,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] in how to predict the growth of delaminations and disbonds under cyclic-fatigue loads. The precise wording used in the FAA Airworthiness Advisory Circular (AAC) 20-107B [4], which covers both composites and adhesively-bonded joints, is:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azari et al, 3 Ripling et al, 5 Jethwa and Kinloch 6 and Curley et al, 7 Mall et al, 8 Pirondi and Nicoletto 9 and Martin and Murri. 10 As a result, Martin and Murri 10 and Jones et al 11 concluded:…”
Section: The Value Of the Exponentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As commented earlier, in the Paris crack‐growth equation, the rate of crack growth per cycle, da / dN , is assumed to be linearly related to either ( G max ) m or (Δ G ) m where the exponent m is a constant that is determined experimentally. Unfortunately, for structural adhesives and fibre‐composite materials, the value of the exponent, m , in this relationship tends to be relatively large, for example, Azari et al , Ripling et al , Jethwa and Kinloch and Curley et al , Mall et al , Pirondi and Nicoletto and Martin and Murri . As a result, Martin and Murri and Jones et al concluded:
For composites, the exponents for relating propagation rate to strain‐energy release rate have been shown to be high especially in Mode I.
…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the Paris relations for the fatigue crack growth in metals are usually characterized by the parameter △K. Because G is proportional to K 2 [33] and K is proportional to the applied force P, both P G  and △G include the parameter △K in the following manner:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%