1997
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.168.2.9016235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatty and fibroglandular tissue volumes in the breasts of women 20-83 years old: comparison of X-ray mammography and computer-assisted MR imaging.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
105
2
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
105
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so there have been attempts to estimate breast tissue composition by analysis of mammograms 30-37 and MRI data. [5][6][7][8]38 Breast CT is capable of producing high-resolution volumetric images of pendant breasts. 10 Breast CT images are subjectively of higher quality than the images from projection mammography.…”
Section: Ib Breast Tissue Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so there have been attempts to estimate breast tissue composition by analysis of mammograms 30-37 and MRI data. [5][6][7][8]38 Breast CT is capable of producing high-resolution volumetric images of pendant breasts. 10 Breast CT images are subjectively of higher quality than the images from projection mammography.…”
Section: Ib Breast Tissue Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With menopause, there is a progressive atrophy of glandular tissue; mitotic activity slows down; and vascular requirements decrease. Some of these changes have been monitored qualitatively by mammography and MRI (3,(18)(19)(20). Involution of breast glandular tissue can be impeded by the use of exogenous hormones, such as estrogen and progesterone (21).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to apply computer methods to measurements of density, with Boyd and Yaffe's interactive threshold program being the most well known [9]. Analyses comparing the actual volume of fibroglandular and fatty tissue measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to the percentage area of density estimated from mammograms demonstrated that the 2D measurements did not truly represent the dense area and tend to overestimate the amount of density [10]. Recent developments in this field explored automated methods that measure density volumetrically.…”
Section: Methods For Assessing Mammographic Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%