2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02172-5_46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fatty Liver Characterization and Classification by Ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…accurate and 100% sensitive. As compared to a recently published work by Ribero and Sanches [16], where the reported accuracy is 95 % and sensitivity is 100% using Bayesian classifier, however the proposed method is much simpler and faster. The only drawback of the proposed method is that their characterization criterion is machine dependent.…”
Section: A New Metricmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…accurate and 100% sensitive. As compared to a recently published work by Ribero and Sanches [16], where the reported accuracy is 95 % and sensitivity is 100% using Bayesian classifier, however the proposed method is much simpler and faster. The only drawback of the proposed method is that their characterization criterion is machine dependent.…”
Section: A New Metricmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Ribeiro and Sanched [28] proposed an automatic classification approach for diagnosing the liver steatosis (fatty liver) from US images. Since physician's diagnosis depends on some characteristics using traditional methods (visual inspection of US images), the features are selected to obtain the similar characteristics utilized by the doctors.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this type of images, involving coherent radiation, the speckle (pseudo)-noise corrupting the image is assumed to be multiplicative in the sense that its variance depends on the underlying noiseless image [6]. Therefore, the observation model assumed in this paper is the following…”
Section: A Pre-processing Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratorial Information [9] Total bilirubin (F 19 ) , prothrombin time (F 20 ) , albumin (F 21 ) , creatinine (F 22 ) , aspartate transaminase (F 23 ), alanine transaminase (F 24 ), gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (F 25 ) , glycemia (F 26 ), sodium (F 27 ), urea (F 28 ) and lactate dehydrogenase(F 29 ). Clinical Information [9] Cause of disease (F 30 ), which include none (0), alcohol (1), hepatitis B (2), hepatitis C (3), alcoholic hepatitis B (4) and C (5) and others (6), and the following binary indicators: Tumor (F 31 ), Ascites (F 32 ), presence of free fluid within the peritoneal cavity; encephalopathy (F 33 ), Gastro-Intestinal bleeding (F 34 ) infection (F 35 ), alcoholic habits (F 36 ) and CHILD score (F 37 ).…”
Section: B Feature Extraction and Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%