2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.09.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault activation and induced seismicity in geological carbon storage – Lessons learned from recent modeling studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
74
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

6
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, deeper sections of a normal fault may be destabilized by the combined effect of thermoelastic and poroelastic stress and by pore pressure increase. This is somewhat similar to previous thermal perturbation effects on fault stability (Segall & Fitzgerald, ) and to injection‐induced fault reactivation studies (De Simone et al, ; Rutqvist et al, ) that showed how the pressurization of a certain rock mass volume influences the state of stress beyond this volume itself. Similar to the above‐mentioned studies, it is possible to infer from our results that also normal fault reactivation could happen above the repository: In this case, shear stress changes depicted in Figure b would be reversed in sign, leading to the nucleation of rupture in the upper section of the fault.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, deeper sections of a normal fault may be destabilized by the combined effect of thermoelastic and poroelastic stress and by pore pressure increase. This is somewhat similar to previous thermal perturbation effects on fault stability (Segall & Fitzgerald, ) and to injection‐induced fault reactivation studies (De Simone et al, ; Rutqvist et al, ) that showed how the pressurization of a certain rock mass volume influences the state of stress beyond this volume itself. Similar to the above‐mentioned studies, it is possible to infer from our results that also normal fault reactivation could happen above the repository: In this case, shear stress changes depicted in Figure b would be reversed in sign, leading to the nucleation of rupture in the upper section of the fault.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Consequently, the number of scientific publications on the subject has also risen dramatically. Most studies, however, focus on injection‐induced seismicity, showing that a complex relationship between pore pressure changes, poroelastic stress, and earthquakes is often at play during an induced earthquake sequence [ Shapiro and Dinske , ; Goertz‐Allmann and Wiemer , ; Committee on Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies , ; Ellsworth , ; Rinaldi et al ., ; Chang and Segall , ; Catalli et al ., ; Rutqvist et al ., ]. By contrast, seismicity during extraction operations has received little attention in the literature, and the relevant physical mechanisms underlying it are not as well understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Afterwards, we use our model within an inverse modeling framework of iTOUGH2-PEST (Finsterle and Zhang, 2011), which includes parameter estimation, sensitivity and uncertainty analyses and apply it to all three injection wells On one hand, the TOUGH-FLAC simulator (Rutqvist, 2011) couples the TOUGH2 simulator for fluid flow in porous media with the FLAC3D simulator for geomechanics and deformation (Itasca, 2009). The applications of TOUGH-FLAC cover geothermal (e.g., Jeanne et al, 2015;Rinaldi et al, 2015a), nuclear waste disposal (e.g., , compressed air storage systems , shale gas 2015), as well as geologic carbon sequestration (Rutqvist et al, 2008; and related induced seismicity (Cappa and Rutqvist, 2011;Rinaldi et al, 2014aRinaldi et al, , 2014bRinaldi et al, , 2015bRutqvist et al, , 2016Urpi et al, 2016). On the other hand, iTOUGH2 (Finsterle, 2004;2007;Finsterle et al, 2014) has been largely used for sensitivity analysis and parameter estimation for several hydrogeological application (e.g., Doetsch et al, 2013;Finsterle et al, 2013;Poskas et al, 2014;Wainwright et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%