2019 IEEE 5th International Conference for Convergence in Technology (I2CT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/i2ct45611.2019.9033687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Classification in Transmission Lines Using Wavelet and CNN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers have explored different aspects of fault classification, including fault inception angles, resistance faults, fault locations, and fault types, leading to a lack of uniformity. In addition, no particular variable has proven to be adequate to be considered the best variable for fault categorization, despite the high accuracy in some of them, and the accuracy varied between studies [28][29][30][31]. Part of the challenge is considering most of the parameters that can affect the fault classification in Table 2 that were not presented in [28,34], or considering some of them, as in [18,25,27,30,31,38], while the others they did not even mention, as in [22,26].…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have explored different aspects of fault classification, including fault inception angles, resistance faults, fault locations, and fault types, leading to a lack of uniformity. In addition, no particular variable has proven to be adequate to be considered the best variable for fault categorization, despite the high accuracy in some of them, and the accuracy varied between studies [28][29][30][31]. Part of the challenge is considering most of the parameters that can affect the fault classification in Table 2 that were not presented in [28,34], or considering some of them, as in [18,25,27,30,31,38], while the others they did not even mention, as in [22,26].…”
Section: Comparison To Previous Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they work hard to reach high accuracy for categorization of the non-stationary signals, they disregard the crucial matter of the data type. However, different articles have stated that high accuracy can be reached by using both of the three-phase signals (voltage and current) as input to machine learning [21,22,[24][25][26][27][28]. While others used only one variable of those previously mentioned [18,[29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both versions of the VGGNet include two completely connected layers, each with a total of 4096 channels. These layers are then followed by a further fully connected layer that consists of 1000 channels and is used to categorise 1000 labels [13]- [15]. In the very last completely connected layer, the softmax layer is the one that's employed for classification.…”
Section: Vggnet and Its Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in [12], raw signals were transformed into two-dimensional grayscale images based on wavelet transform and deep CNN to extract robust features. In [13], a novel fault detection and classification method was proposed by using the DWT and CWT filter banks.…”
Section: Traditional Fault Detection and Intelligent Fault Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%