2019 8th International Conference on Power Systems (ICPS) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icps48983.2019.9067699
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Classification in VSC-HVDC Transmission System using Machine Learning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…KNN model is used for the fault type classification module because it is not being activated continuously (mostly operating in idle phase) and the fourth class of this module (non-fault class) makes a redundancy, which compensates the startup unit's probable error by a different ML model. comparing to machine learningbased protection algorithms such as [38,39,42,43] which just covers dependability of protection (since all test cases are in-zone faults), our results also show the examination of the security aspect of protection reliability too. Although the reference [44] is proposed for VSC based HVDC systems, the results are only limited to fault detection with an accuracy of 86.5%.…”
Section: Highlighted Preferences Of the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…KNN model is used for the fault type classification module because it is not being activated continuously (mostly operating in idle phase) and the fourth class of this module (non-fault class) makes a redundancy, which compensates the startup unit's probable error by a different ML model. comparing to machine learningbased protection algorithms such as [38,39,42,43] which just covers dependability of protection (since all test cases are in-zone faults), our results also show the examination of the security aspect of protection reliability too. Although the reference [44] is proposed for VSC based HVDC systems, the results are only limited to fault detection with an accuracy of 86.5%.…”
Section: Highlighted Preferences Of the Proposed Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 63%