European Test Symposium (ETS'05)
DOI: 10.1109/ets.2005.24
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Collapsing for Flash Memory Disturb Faults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a split-gate cell, the channel of the transistor is split and overlapped by two distinct gates, i.e., FG and CG. In general, the stacked-gate cell is called a 1T cell, and the split-gate cell is called a 1.5T cell [21]. Because the split-gate cell can inhibit punchthrough on the unselected rows and prevents leakage current on the BL, the BL disturb faults and over-erase disturb faults are not likely to occur.…”
Section: Functional Fault Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a split-gate cell, the channel of the transistor is split and overlapped by two distinct gates, i.e., FG and CG. In general, the stacked-gate cell is called a 1T cell, and the split-gate cell is called a 1.5T cell [21]. Because the split-gate cell can inhibit punchthrough on the unselected rows and prevents leakage current on the BL, the BL disturb faults and over-erase disturb faults are not likely to occur.…”
Section: Functional Fault Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the reduced fault lists can be used to develop more efficient test algorithms. In [8], however, only the impact of the cell structure and array type (NAND or NOR array) on the disturbance faults is discussed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], Mohammad and Terkawi presents the fault collapsing concept for disturbance faults of flash memories. The reduced fault lists of flash memories with various cell structures (i.e., 1T or 1.5T cell) and array types (i.e., NAND or NOR array) are different.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [12], Mohammad and Terkawi present the fault collapsing concept for disturbance faults of flash memories. The reduced fault lists of flash memories with various cell structures (i.e., 1 T or 1.5 T cell) and array types (i.e., NAND or NOR array) are different.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, the reduced fault lists can be used to develop more efficient test algorithms. In [12], however, only the impact of the cell structure and array type (NAND or NOR array) on the disturbance faults is discussed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%