2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12244769
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Current Constraint Transmission Expansion Planning Based on the Inverse Matrix Modification Lemma and a Valid Inequality

Abstract: In the transmission expansion planning (TEP) problem, it is challenging to consider a fault current level constraint due to the time-consuming update process of the bus impedance matrix, which is required to calculate the fault currents during the search for the optimal solution. In the existing studies, either a nonlinear update equation or its linearized version is used to calculate the updated bus impedance matrix. In the former case, there is a problem in that the mathematical formulation is derived in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first stream of research concentrates on suppressing different short-circuit levels in the transmission grids [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In [8], the short-circuit level constraint was linearly modelled to restrict fault currents passing through the transmission grid buses below a prescribed safety threshold.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first stream of research concentrates on suppressing different short-circuit levels in the transmission grids [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. In [8], the short-circuit level constraint was linearly modelled to restrict fault currents passing through the transmission grid buses below a prescribed safety threshold.…”
Section: Literature Review and Research Gapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Relationships ( 7) and ( 8) similarly describe the investment cost of the FCL-HTS cables at stage t and the investment cost of the FCL-HTS cable n in the right-of-way (u,v) at stage t, respectively. Relationship (9) shows the investment cost of the DGs at stage t. The first and second terms of the relationship (10) explain the operation costs of the CG r and DG at stage t, respectively. Relationships ( 11)-( 13) denote the flexibility weighting factors of the transmission line h, PL-HTS cable m, and FCL-HTS cable n in the right-of-way (u,v), respectively.…”
Section: Mathematical Model Of the Proposed Multistage Ac Tep Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The branch-and-cut algorithm is derived from the branch-and-bound algorithm combined with the cutting plane method [53], whose flowchart is presented in Fig. C1.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A third creates linear approximations of the nonconvex constraints [42]. Last, the nonlinear constraints are relaxed in order to convexify the problem [43]. All these approaches focus on modeling positive-sequence representations of networks and do not address the additional complexities of modeling unbalanced multi-phase systems that are typical of microgrids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%