“…Particularly, the Tennessee Eastman process simulator (Ricker, 2014) has been widely used for the assessment and comparison of the performance of different algorithms due to its realistic level of complexity and the challenges attached to the fact that it is a highly non-linear system. The popularity of this particular benchmark case is demonstrated by the high number of researchers who have used it in the last Contents lists available at ScienceDirect journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/conengprac years to prove the validity of a large variety of approaches based on PCA (Fan, Qin & Wang, 2014;Lau, Ghosh, Hussain & Che Hassan, 2013;Wang & Li, 2012;Rato & Reis, 2013), PLS (Ma, Hu, Yan & Shi, 2012;Yi, Hehe & Hongbo, 2013), CVA (Stubbs, Zhang & Morris, 2012;Odiowei & Cao, 2010), Fisher Discriminant Analysis (FDA) (He, Yang & Yang, 2008), Latent Subspace Projection (LSP) (Mori & Yu, 2014), Sensitive Fault Analysis (SFA) (Jiang & Yan, 2012) or Bayesian Networks (Liu & Chen, 2009;Verron, Li & Tiplica, 2010) among others.…”