2023
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6501/acfd4b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection and quantitative assessment of wheel diameter difference based on ensemble adaptive tunable Q-factor wavelet transform and mixed kernel principal component analysis

Shunqi Sui,
Kaiyun Wang,
Shiqian Chen

Abstract: Tread wear is inevitable for railway vehicles. Because of the complicated railway condition, the wear rates of the two wheels of a wheelset are usually unequal, which leads to the wheel diameter difference (WDD). The WDD shortens the service life of the wheelset and deteriorates the dynamic performance of railway vehicles. Therefore, it has long been desired to monitor and quantify the WDD condition. However, influenced by the random irregularity, the effective vibration features induced by the WDD may be comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 34 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More than 80% of the existing literature on bearing fault diagnosis employs vibration signal-analysis methods. Tis method usually uses manual approaches such as the fast Fourier transform (FFT) [10], wavelet transform (WT) [11], and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [12] to extract signal features and then uses a support vector machine (SVM) [13], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [14], and BP neural network (BPNN) [15] to obtain diagnostic results. However, these feature extraction methods rely on expert experience and knowledge, which can easily introduce artifcial errors and have poor generalization ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 80% of the existing literature on bearing fault diagnosis employs vibration signal-analysis methods. Tis method usually uses manual approaches such as the fast Fourier transform (FFT) [10], wavelet transform (WT) [11], and empirical mode decomposition (EMD) [12] to extract signal features and then uses a support vector machine (SVM) [13], K-nearest neighbor (KNN) [14], and BP neural network (BPNN) [15] to obtain diagnostic results. However, these feature extraction methods rely on expert experience and knowledge, which can easily introduce artifcial errors and have poor generalization ability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%