2009
DOI: 10.3182/20090630-4-es-2003.00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection for Shipboard Monitoring – Volterra Kernel and Hammerstein Model Approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wittkuhn et al [57]. Moreover, for DSS and the combined use of onboard monitoring systems there is also a (foreseen) great potential in looking at ideas developed within control engineering with regard to (automatic) fault monitoring and detection, so that the decision support system can be developed as a fault tolerant system; studies in this area have begun, see Lajic et al [26] and Lajic and Nielsen [27].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittkuhn et al [57]. Moreover, for DSS and the combined use of onboard monitoring systems there is also a (foreseen) great potential in looking at ideas developed within control engineering with regard to (automatic) fault monitoring and detection, so that the decision support system can be developed as a fault tolerant system; studies in this area have begun, see Lajic et al [26] and Lajic and Nielsen [27].…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residuals were evaluated by the GLR test, and all the faults were detected and isolated. Using the model presented in the paper, we are able not only to detect, as in case of previous models given by [7] and [8], but also to isolate all the faults. Having fault isolation is very important for the design of a fault tolerant monitoring and decision support system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several papers deal with fault-tolerant monitoring and/or control of ship responses to the waves. Fault detection and fault-tolerant approaches for the SeaSense system have been presented in [7] and [8] using a different model than the model described in this paper. With the "old" model, purely based on the ship kinematics, it was possible to detect, but not to isolate all the faults.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To support these approaches, different data collection practices employed in the shipping industry for acquiring data on-board ships (Armstrong & Banks, 2015;Aldous, et al, 2015), in specific: (a) Noon Reports (NR), where the crew is responsible of recording one data entry every 24 hours, and (b) Automatic Data Logging Monitoring (ADLM) systems, which can record a number of parameters at any specified sampling rate that usually results in a vast amount of high-quality data (Nielsen, et al, 2012;Lajic, et al, 2009;Perera & Mo, 2016). By employing the NR method, the data parameters recorded are limited and the data quality may be doubtable owing to the involvement of the human element.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%