2019
DOI: 10.1109/tro.2019.2929015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection in a Swarm of Physical Robots Based on Behavioral Outlier Detection

Abstract: The ability to reliably detect faults is essential in many realworld tasks that robot swarms have the potential to perform. Most studies on fault detection in swarm robotics have been conducted exclusively in simulation, and they have focused on a single type of fault or a specific task. In a series of previous studies, we have developed a robust fault-detection approach in which robots in a swarm learn to distinguish between normal and faulty behaviors online. In this paper, we assess the performance of our f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In more recent work, Tarapore et al ( 2017 ) proposed the use of a consensus algorithm so that the robots can collectively reach a decision on whether the behavior of a team-member can be considered normal or abnormal. This was also tested on a real robotic system (Tarapore et al, 2019 ). Qin et al ( 2014 ) provide a review on this active area of research.…”
Section: Further Challenges and Future Developments To Be Madementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In more recent work, Tarapore et al ( 2017 ) proposed the use of a consensus algorithm so that the robots can collectively reach a decision on whether the behavior of a team-member can be considered normal or abnormal. This was also tested on a real robotic system (Tarapore et al, 2019 ). Qin et al ( 2014 ) provide a review on this active area of research.…”
Section: Further Challenges and Future Developments To Be Madementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To sample a part of this space, the fault injection scheme determines for each robot in the swarm independently a randomly chosen fault before any trials are started. The fault is chosen from the following 8 fault types previously used in studies on fault-detection in robot swarms [17], [54], which are applied at each control cycle with random variables being sampled anew:…”
Section: B Fault Recovery Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first survey on security issues in robot swarms, Higgins et al (2009) identify tampered swarm members or failing sensors, attacked or noisy communication channels, and loss of availability as the main threats to robot swarms. Tarapore et al (2015Tarapore et al ( , 2017Tarapore et al ( , 2019 address the detection of faulty robots in both simulated and physical robot swarms. Their method is based on outlier detection using the bioinspired crossregulation model.…”
Section: Security Issues In Swarm Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, real-world operation will almost certainly result in robots in the swarm that either fail (e.g., due to dust blocking their sensors) or that are malicious (e.g., due to a hacker who gains control). These failures can damage people, nature, animals, and other robots, making the reliable detection of failures a crucial task (Tarapore et al, 2019 ). We use the term Byzantine robot—based on Byzantine fault-tolerance and the Byzantine Generals Problem (Lamport et al, 1982 )—as an umbrella term to describe robots that show unintended or inconsistent behavior, independent of the underlying cause.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%