2018 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2018.8619048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Detection in Artificial Pancreas: A Model-Free approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The UVa/Padova simulator allows the incorporation of different meal scenarios for the virtual patient (VP) population, allowing researchers to analyze the effectiveness of a control algorithm [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], validate optimization and adaptation strategies for insulin delivery [23][24][25][26], develop disturbance detection algorithms for meals [27][28][29] and exercise [30], develop methods for mitigating the risks of hypoglycemia [31,32], and integrate machine learning algorithms into conventional diabetes therapy and bolus calculator for the treatment of T1D patients [33][34][35]. In the literature, the meal scenarios used for testing BG regulation effectiveness are based on typical values considering three meals per day [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, in real life, the amount of carbohydrate intake and number of meals per day may vary patient to patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The UVa/Padova simulator allows the incorporation of different meal scenarios for the virtual patient (VP) population, allowing researchers to analyze the effectiveness of a control algorithm [16][17][18][19][20][21][22], validate optimization and adaptation strategies for insulin delivery [23][24][25][26], develop disturbance detection algorithms for meals [27][28][29] and exercise [30], develop methods for mitigating the risks of hypoglycemia [31,32], and integrate machine learning algorithms into conventional diabetes therapy and bolus calculator for the treatment of T1D patients [33][34][35]. In the literature, the meal scenarios used for testing BG regulation effectiveness are based on typical values considering three meals per day [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. However, in real life, the amount of carbohydrate intake and number of meals per day may vary patient to patient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…physical knowledge. These are called data-driven methods [8], [6], [26] which are principally rely on the information gathered by data acquisition system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven methods can be categorized into three main categories: 1) supervised [14], [1], [8], [27], 2) semi-supervised [28], and 3) unsupervised [6], [26], [3], [23] anomaly detection. Since the labelled data, which is required for supervised anomaly detection, is often not available or in other words, collecting sufficient anomolous samples is infeasible in most of the cases, many researchers have tried to detect anomalies without labelled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data-driven methods can be categorized into three main categories: 1) supervised [14], [1], [8], [27], 2) semi-supervised [28], and 3) unsupervised [6], [26], [3], [23] anomaly detection. Since the labelled data, which is required for supervised anomaly detection, is often not available or in other words, collecting sufficient anomolous samples is infeasible in most of the cases, many researchers have tried to detect anomalies without labelled data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%