2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2016.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault detection in uncertain LPV systems with imperfect scheduling parameter using sliding mode observers

Abstract: This paper presents a sliding mode fault detection scheme for linear parameter varying (LPV) systems with uncertain or imperfectly measured scheduling parameters. In the majority of LPV systems, it is assumed that the scheduling parameters are exactly known. In reality due to noise or possibly faulty sensors, it is sometimes impossible to have accurate knowledge of the scheduling parameters and a design based on the assumption of perfect knowledge of the scheduling parameters cannot be guaranteed to work well … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 3. For a known l > 0, given a scalar 0 < < 1, error dynamic system (6) satisfies conditions (i)-(iii) if there exist scalars > 0, 1 > 0, 2 > 0, 1 > 0, 2 > 0, symmetric matrices P 1 (h) = P T 1 (h) > 0, P 2 (h) = P T 2 (h), ∀h( (k)), h + ∶ = (h 1 ( (k + 1)), h 2 ( (k + 1)), … , h r ( (k + 1))), Q ∈ R n x ×n x , Q > 0 and matrices G ∈ R n x ×n x , S 1 ∈ R n x ×n x , S 2 ∈ R n x ×n x , S 3 ∈ R n ×n x , L(h) ∈ R n x ×n such that (15), (16) and the following inequality hold…”
Section: Fault Detection Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Theorem 3. For a known l > 0, given a scalar 0 < < 1, error dynamic system (6) satisfies conditions (i)-(iii) if there exist scalars > 0, 1 > 0, 2 > 0, 1 > 0, 2 > 0, symmetric matrices P 1 (h) = P T 1 (h) > 0, P 2 (h) = P T 2 (h), ∀h( (k)), h + ∶ = (h 1 ( (k + 1)), h 2 ( (k + 1)), … , h r ( (k + 1))), Q ∈ R n x ×n x , Q > 0 and matrices G ∈ R n x ×n x , S 1 ∈ R n x ×n x , S 2 ∈ R n x ×n x , S 3 ∈ R n ×n x , L(h) ∈ R n x ×n such that (15), (16) and the following inequality hold…”
Section: Fault Detection Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the conditions in Theorem 3 are nonlinear matrix inequalities and cannot be easily solved. Therefore, to facilitate the design, we convert (15), (16), and (29) into a set of LMIs.…”
Section: Fault Detection Observer Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existing solutions in the literature are based on the assumption that the designed observers converge to the true values of the state. If only interval estimation is achievable, then the conventional approaches [49], [5], [54] cannot be applied, but interval observers demonstrated their efficiency for stabilizing control design in different classes of systems [23], [22], and in this work the approach is extended to impulsive systems. This paper sets out to make a contribution at two levels.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been a great number of papers concerning the problem of estimating state variables and unknown inputs for continuous-time systems using sliding mode approaches: see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7] and references therein. A typical property of these observers is that a sliding surface based on the output error is constructed and a nonlinear switching injection term is introduced to force the output errors to reach the sliding surface in finite time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%