2017
DOI: 10.1049/iet-cta.2017.0357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

fault detection observer design in finite‐frequency domain for Lipschitz non‐linear systems

Abstract: This study is about H − /H ∞ fault detection observer design in finite-frequency domain for Lipschitz non-linear systems with actuator fault. To make the generated residual sensitive to fault while robust against disturbance, the authors derive design conditions for the fault detection observer to achieve H − fault sensitivity performance in finite-frequency domain and H ∞ disturbance attenuation performance. The authors further transform the design conditions as a set of linear matrix inequalities to facilita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(83 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among model‐based fault detection methods, the observer‐based technique has been proved to be a powerful method by comparing the value of the residual signal with a predesigned threshold. Such as in Reference 11, actuator fault detection observer design in the finite‐frequency domain for Lipschitz non‐linear systems was considered, while sensor fault detection observer design for nonlinear systems with limited communication capacity was proposed in Reference 12. Finite‐frequency fault detect observer design for the fuzzy and LPV systems were respectively studied in References 13 and 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among model‐based fault detection methods, the observer‐based technique has been proved to be a powerful method by comparing the value of the residual signal with a predesigned threshold. Such as in Reference 11, actuator fault detection observer design in the finite‐frequency domain for Lipschitz non‐linear systems was considered, while sensor fault detection observer design for nonlinear systems with limited communication capacity was proposed in Reference 12. Finite‐frequency fault detect observer design for the fuzzy and LPV systems were respectively studied in References 13 and 14.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In passive FD, the system is monitored using the system inputs and outputs without manipulation. Passive FD approaches can be divided into model-based methods, 5,6 knowledge-based methods, 7 and data-driven methods. 8,9 On the other hand, the key idea of active FD is to enhance the output separability of the healthy model from the faulty ones by manipulating the input signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These FD methods are always inaccurate in the presence of parameter variations in the SBW system, such as variation of the tire cornering stiffness and the system damping coefficient. To resolve this problem, sliding mode control (Huang et al , 2017; Dhahri et al , 2012) can be used to design the fault observer or the H_/H∞ index (Chen and Patton, 2017; Aouaouda et al , 2015; Hou and Patton, 1996; Zhou et al , 2017; Yang et al , 2013; Chilali and Gahinet, 1996) can be used to design the fault observer, to ensure that the FD is robust to influence of interference. However, although the fault observer designed in these previous studies can detect system failure, it is still difficult to determine faulty components and identify the fault size and time-varying characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%