2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-011-0649-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault diagnosis of a benchmark fermentation process: a comparative study of feature extraction and classification techniques

Abstract: This paper investigates fault diagnosis in batch processes and presents a comparative study of feature extraction and classification techniques applied to a specific biotechnological case study: the fermentation process model by Birol et al. (Comput Chem Eng 26:1553-1565, 2002), which is a benchmark for advanced batch processes monitoring, diagnosis and control. Fault diagnosis is achieved using four approaches on four different process scenarios based on the different levels of noise so as to evaluate their e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 150 Pensim batches (50 of each of three types of process upsets) was used by Monroy et al [59] to test fault identification via Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). Information on the types of upset and their (fixed) magnitude is provided, but not on onset time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A total of 150 Pensim batches (50 of each of three types of process upsets) was used by Monroy et al [59] to test fault identification via Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM). Information on the types of upset and their (fixed) magnitude is provided, but not on onset time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dimensionality reduction is a first possible pretreatment step. Monroy et al [20] reduced the data of each batch to a score vector using PCA or ICA and use the resulting scores as input for the classifier. To train the PCA or ICA model, Monroy et al [20] generated artificial data sets containing an equal number of normal and faulty batches.…”
Section: Data Selection and Pretreatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned methods [16][17][18][19][20] are essentially offline diagnosis methods since the classifier is trained on entire faulty batches, not faulty episodes. Hence, before fault classification, the new (faulty) batch needs to be completed or its future variable trajectories estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this order, FD outcomes are arranged in a validation confusion matrix (Monroy, Villez, Graells, & Venkatasubramanian, 2012) presented in Table 1. …”
Section: Key Performance Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%