2009
DOI: 10.1243/09544100jaero422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault diagnosis with matrix analysis for electrically actuated unmanned aerial vehicles

Abstract: Because of their large operational potential, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) may be required to perform over long periods of time, which might lead to potential degradation or even failure of their electrical or/and mechanical control surfaces and components. Consequently, the least failure can degrade the performance of the process and might lead to a catastrophic event. Therefore, an efficient mechanism should be capable of making these faults realizable and act accordingly so that a performance index is co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite of their success, DPCA and DPLS have been reported not to be as efficient as other state-space based methodologies such as Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) when applied to systems working under variable loading conditions, principally due to the representation of the system dynamics (Juricek, Seborg & Larimore, 2004;Russell, Chiang & Braatz, 2000). Other popular approaches typically used for condition monitoring are neural networks, machine learning or fault-tree analysis (Chiang, Rusell & Braatz, 2000;Kladis, Economou, Tsourdos, White & Knowles, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of their success, DPCA and DPLS have been reported not to be as efficient as other state-space based methodologies such as Canonical Variate Analysis (CVA) when applied to systems working under variable loading conditions, principally due to the representation of the system dynamics (Juricek, Seborg & Larimore, 2004;Russell, Chiang & Braatz, 2000). Other popular approaches typically used for condition monitoring are neural networks, machine learning or fault-tree analysis (Chiang, Rusell & Braatz, 2000;Kladis, Economou, Tsourdos, White & Knowles, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FTA is a deductive, top down approach, which is mainly used to analyze system failures. 10 Most research works are in the field of system fault diagnosis and assessment, [11][12][13][14][15][16] except for a few studies dealing with special cases involving structures. Specifically, a fault tree technique was used to examine the static tensile failure of a fibrous composite laminate from a micromechanical aspect.…”
Section: Composite Structure Fault Tree Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using these methods, some authors have considered sensor faults only [7,[11][12][13][14][15], actuator faults only [9,10,[16][17][18][19][20], or non-simultaneous sensor and actuator faults [8,21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is also an emerging trend towards fully non-linear FDI methods [9, 10]. Using these methods, some authors have considered sensor faults only [7, 11–15], actuator faults only [9, 10, 16–20], or non-simultaneous sensor and actuator faults [8, 21, 22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%