2015
DOI: 10.14257/ijdta.2015.8.4.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-Tolerance Techniques in Cloud Storage: A Survey

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [14,15], the authors introduced a survey on fault tolerance. Each system was able to interactive safely with unexpected failures or faults from hardware or software called fault tolerance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14,15], the authors introduced a survey on fault tolerance. Each system was able to interactive safely with unexpected failures or faults from hardware or software called fault tolerance.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have emphasized fault-tolerant architectures, their mechanisms, and criticality in ensuring service availability and delivery in service systems (Garcia & Toledo, 2007;Laranjeiro et al, 2008;Aghaei et al, 2011;Ahmed & Wu, 2013;Vargas-Santiago et al, 2017;Li et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2019;Dahling et al, 2021). Relatively, existing fault-tolerant architectures have been centered around redundant mechanisms in terms of replication (active and passive), diversity, and N-Version Programming Laranjeiro et al, 2008;Hosseini & Arani, 2015;Kumari & Kaur, 2018;Pandey et al, 2019;Abdi & Shahoveisi, 2022). Therefore, the effect of faulttolerant mechanisms on the overall system's performance is critical to the service-oriented system communities and open to research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the architecture identifies the minimal effect of fault tolerance on the responsiveness or performance of a fault-tolerant service system under a service replica failure or replica-related overheads over an interval of time. Performance is relatively measured with the attributes of response time (latency), throughput, and response stability -guaranteed responsiveness (Dobson & Sommerville, 2005;Garcia & Toledo, 2007;Laranjeiro et al, 2008;Lau et al, 2008;Carzaniga et al, 2009;Aghaei et al, 2011;Ladan, 2011;Ahmed & Wu, 2013;Hosseini & Arani, 2015;Sari & Akkaya, 2015;Kumari & Kaur, 2018;Li et al, 2018;Pandey et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%