2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.529
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-Tolerant Cooperative Motion Planning of Connected and Automated Vehicles at a Signal-Free and Lane-Free Intersection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has proven its efficiency in both fault excitation and fault mitigation in an autonomous system, such as the electrical power train of an autonomous vehicle. In the same area of interest, connected vehicles represent the future of automotive, and work [ 20 ] proposes a fault-tolerant cooperative motion planning method for a cloud of connected vehicles designed to a more flexible driving, thereby promoting the throughput to reducing congestions. The solution relies on a parallel computation framework, which enables to keep solving the original goals as much as possible when faults have partially degraded the vehicle cloud’s work capability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has proven its efficiency in both fault excitation and fault mitigation in an autonomous system, such as the electrical power train of an autonomous vehicle. In the same area of interest, connected vehicles represent the future of automotive, and work [ 20 ] proposes a fault-tolerant cooperative motion planning method for a cloud of connected vehicles designed to a more flexible driving, thereby promoting the throughput to reducing congestions. The solution relies on a parallel computation framework, which enables to keep solving the original goals as much as possible when faults have partially degraded the vehicle cloud’s work capability.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current research activities concerning AGV control aim at further improving the path following capabilities, for instance a robust H ∞ output-feedback control strategy is refined and applied in [ 3 ]. Another central issue in AGV control is the motion planning; several researchers worldwide address this issue [ 4 , 5 ]. Several research groups look into navigation tasks and self-orientation, such as simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ].…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system-optimal policy is the second most-used priority policy where the crossing sequence is determined based on system-level performance measures, such as overall delay, throughput, travel time, etc. 12 Carlino et al [28] 12 Bashiri and Fleming [21] n/a Bashiri et al [29] 12 Jiang et al [30] n/a Kamal et al [12] 12 Carlson [25] 2 Levin and Rey [31] 12 Zohdy et al [19] 4 Du et al [32] 2 Ding et al [15] 12 Bashiri et al [33] 12 Li et al [13] unlimited Jin et al [26] 2 Mirheli et al [34] 8 Li and Zhang [35] unlimited Wuthishuwong et al [36] 12 Liu et al [17] 12 Zohdy and Hakha [18] 12 Zhao et al [37] 12 Hassan and Hakha [38] 4 Stone et al [39] 12 Fayazi et al [22] 4 Lam and Katupitiya [24] 2 Creemers et al [40] 5 Other priority policies have been reported, such as longestqueue-first policy [41], vehicle type-based policy [42], custom priority score-based policy [17], and auction-based policy [28]. Table III lists the major AIM study with regard to the coverage of the three-layer intersection management structure.…”
Section: B Priority Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 displays the simulated vehicles and the number of turning movements for an intersection among the reviewed studies. The vehicle-based (VB) AIM [13,35] is not shown, as it theoretically has an infinite number of turning movements. Due to the nature of the intersection-based (IB) reservation (occupancy of an entire intersection), the simulated movements did not excess 4 in the previous studies.…”
Section: A Simulation Scalementioning
confidence: 99%