2014 Sixth International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms and Programming 2014
DOI: 10.1109/paap.2014.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-Tolerant Distributed Publish/Subscribe Using Self-Stabilization

Abstract: We propose a new fault-tolerant (self-stabilizing) distributed framework for the publish/subscribe scheme in a P2P network, where the participating nodes (peers) only need the state information of its immediate neighbors. The proposed system is guaranteed to recover from an unlimited number of transient faults (e.g., state corruption). We provide a complexity analysis of the recovery (stabilization) time of the system after arbitrary failures in the network. Also, we show that the system always remains alive a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thesis [6] focuses on the fault tolerance in distributed systems using self-stabilization. This work presents a collection of self-stabilizing algorithms for well-known problems in distributed systems, and presents the first set of self-stabilizing algorithms with safe convergence property for packing and alliance problems in arbitrary network graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thesis [6] focuses on the fault tolerance in distributed systems using self-stabilization. This work presents a collection of self-stabilizing algorithms for well-known problems in distributed systems, and presents the first set of self-stabilizing algorithms with safe convergence property for packing and alliance problems in arbitrary network graphs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an approach is able to make the system service always available, but the redundancy may considerably increase the cost of the system. The nonmasking fault tolerance approach is relatively cheap, but the drawback of this approach is that it accepts the temporary unavailability of the system service for a limited time [6].…”
Section: Fault Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation