2017
DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1701074
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-tolerant quantum error detection

Abstract: We show the fault-tolerant encoding, measurement, and operation of a logical qubit via quantum error detection.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
147
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(147 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, the question of what constitutes a minimal experimental demonstration of fault-tolerance was considered [13]. Fault-tolerant state preparation was demonstrated soon thereafter using a quantum error detecting code with trapped atomic ions [14]. Here we go beyond that result, implementing fault-tolerant state preparation on a superconducting qubit system with supporting evidence including quantum state tomography of prepared codewords, acceptance and logical error probabilities with and without error insertion, and analysis of the measured logical observables under free evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the question of what constitutes a minimal experimental demonstration of fault-tolerance was considered [13]. Fault-tolerant state preparation was demonstrated soon thereafter using a quantum error detecting code with trapped atomic ions [14]. Here we go beyond that result, implementing fault-tolerant state preparation on a superconducting qubit system with supporting evidence including quantum state tomography of prepared codewords, acceptance and logical error probabilities with and without error insertion, and analysis of the measured logical observables under free evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the use of magnetic clock transitions [119,130], decoherence free subspaces [131], or sympathetic cooling ions [129] during computation has been observed to increase the T 2 coherence times of the qubits to the order of seconds. A 5-qubit system that has implemented small quantum algorithms [17] and the 4, 2, 2  error detection code [62] with hyperfine qubits exhibits a T 2 * of ≈0.5 s [47], but further magnetic field stabilization could improve this as shown in [129] which exhibits over a 10 minute coherence time for trapped 171 Yb + ions.…”
Section: Single Error Source Dominant Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This current error rate is well above the reported pseudothreshold for the surface-17 code, but gates with a 99.9% fidelity shown in two-ion experiments [51] are, in principle, achievable in larger chains with appropriate control to handle the more complex mode structure [57,58]. The two-ion gates simulated in this paper to determine the gate times have, in principle, fidelities of 99.99%.Atomic ion experiments have already demonstrated classical error correction [59, 60], encoding logical states for quantum error correction [61], and fault-tolerant quantum error detection [62]. In addition, multiple theoretical studies have examined implementation of quantum error correcting codes with trapped ions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While further improvements can come from more carefully engineering the qubit systems to remove undesired noise sources and reduce the number of decoherence channels, achieving fault tolerance will still require some form of quantum error correction (QEC). Recent developments include both theoretical proposals for more powerful QEC protocols [6] and experimental attempts at correcting or detecting quantum errors [7][8][9][10]. Despite these advances, we have rarely seen experiments yielding better error rate of the error-corrected qubit than the best single qubit in the same system [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%