Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communication on the Applications, Technologies, 2020
DOI: 10.1145/3387514.3405863
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault Tolerant Service Function Chaining

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Em [Ghaznavi et al 2020] os autores propõem FTC (Fault Tolerant Chaining), um sistema para prover tolerância a falhas crash para SFCs. Através do próprio processamento dos pacotes, o sistema FTC extrai informac ¸ões sobre o estado das VNFs.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Em [Ghaznavi et al 2020] os autores propõem FTC (Fault Tolerant Chaining), um sistema para prover tolerância a falhas crash para SFCs. Através do próprio processamento dos pacotes, o sistema FTC extrai informac ¸ões sobre o estado das VNFs.…”
Section: Trabalhos Relacionadosunclassified
“…Apesar de que estratégias diversas para a construc ¸ão de servic ¸os virtuais tolerantes a falhas já foram propostos [Venâncio et al 2021, Ghaznavi et al 2020, Qu et al 2016, todos consideram apenas falhas por parada (crash) de VNFs. Sendo assim, este trabalho propõe uma nova estratégia para a replicac ¸ão, mapeamento e tolerância a falhas em SFCs que considera a possibilidade dos três componentes (VNF, SC e SFF) da arquitetura SFC da IETF sofrerem falhas crash ou intrusão (falhas bizantinas).…”
Section: Introduc ¸ãOunclassified
“…Recent frameworks allow the application states to be directly transferred between the application instances. The frameworks [31], [50], [51] reduced the network overhead by introducing a compact format for the application states. These studies strive to fulfill the low-latency (R1) requirement, but their designs couple packet processing and state processing when handling user requests, i.e., the application states are stored locally at the source instance.…”
Section: Related Work On State Transfer Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Delivering SFCs in such applications needs to provide fault tolerance against failures of both physical component (e.g., node or link) and software (e.g., SF instance). Most existing research concentrated on fault tolerance of a network [11]- [19], but few works have focused on fault-tolerant mechanisms of the SFC delivery [20]- [23]. In [22], two disjoint SFPs (primary and backup) are established to tolerate a single node, link, or SF instance failure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%