2008
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2008.4536156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fault-tolerant static scheduling for grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Workflow scheduling as well as workflow rescheduling are classical NP-complete problems [15], [21]. Therefore, many heuristic algorithms are proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Workflow scheduling as well as workflow rescheduling are classical NP-complete problems [15], [21]. Therefore, many heuristic algorithms are proposed.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Business process and workflow scheduling are known as classical NP-complete problems [Yu and Buyya 2006;Fechner et al 2008;Liu et al 2011]. When resource availability constraints need to be additionally considered, finding the optimal solution to the problem defined above is even computationally harder.…”
Section: Heuristic-based Scheduling Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of mapping tasks onto given resources is known to be NP-complete Buyya 2005, 2006;Fechner et al 2008;Liu et al 2011]. Due to its complexity, lots of heuristic methods have been proposed to address some classical problems, such as job shop scheduling and queuing mechanisms for operating system.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] author use the equal-time partition strategy, which partitions the parallel task (w) into subtasks with workload (w k ) for machine (m k ) such that the same mean subtask completion time can be reached at each machine. In [3] a fault tolerant static scheduler for grid applications that uses task duplication is designed. If a processing unit crashes, then the work it would have to carry in the future must be distributed onto other processing units.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%