Faux Fur Trade Networks Using Macroscopic Data: A Social Network Approach

Abstract

This study used social network analysis, which is often adopted to analyze changes in trade structures and the world trade network for faux fur products, which are alternative materials used in vegan fashion. The data on the total trade value of artificial fur (HS Code: 4304) and animal fur and leather (HS Code: 0505) imports and exports between countries were collected through UN Comtrade, and the degree and betweenness centralities were used to analyze the trade structure of faux fur in 2009, 2014, and 2019 using NodeXL 1.0.1 programs. The results of the study are as follows: First, while the total amount of export and import of faux fur is increasing globally every day, the total amount of export and import in other Asian countries and Vietnam is decreasing. Second, due to the reduction in exports of the main producing countries of animal materials such as China, global imports of animal fur and leather decreased. Third, China was the largest ex-porter of faux fur, exporting to a large number of countries; it also played an important role in the intermediation and control over faux fur export. In exporting faux fur, the influence of other Asian countries declined over time, and Vietnam and the United States played an outstanding role as arbitrators in the export network. Fourth, Italy and France were the largest importers of faux fur from various countries and exerted significant influence as intermediaries in the import network of faux fur. On the other hand, Vietnam’s influence in import network decreased. Saudi Arabia appeared to be an important arbitrator in mediating the import. This study is significant due to its findings, obtained through micro-trading data, in respect of industrial moves of ethical fashion in the form of increased trade in faux fur and decline in the trade of animal fur and leather.

Changes in consumers’ awareness and interest in cosmetic products during the pandemic

“…Centrality analysis defines the meanings of each keyword in the context of a document (Choi et al, 2021 ), which are indicated in terms of degree, betweenness, closeness, and eigenvector centrality (Kwahk, 2014 ), as shown in Eqs. 2 – 5 .…”

Exploring the impacts of Covid-19 on the electronic product trade of the G-7 countries: A complex network analysis approach and panel data analysis

“…Studies utilizing network analysis have been conducted on global trade contexts [ 13 – 18 ], intra-African countries [ 19 ], ASEAN countries [ 15 , 20 ], OECD countries [ 21 ], China, BRIC, and African countries [ 22 , 23 ], Latin American countries [ 24 ], Shanghai Cooperation Organization countries [ 25 ], and Central Asia and Caucasus countries [ 26 ]. Furthermore, these studies focus on general trade [ 15 , 17 – 19 , 21 , 22 , 24 – 27 ], energy [ 13 , 14 , 16 , 23 , 28 ], food [ 29 – 31 ], clothing [ 32 , 33 ], and electronic products [ 4 ]. However, to the best of our knowledge, no studies have examined electronic product trade at the country group level during the COVID-19 period using complex network and panel data analyses.…”