2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2020.107816
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FaVAD: A software workflow for characterization and visualizing of defects in crystalline structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work thus shows that the methodology used until now by many groups to identify two defects as belonging to the same cluster, which relies only on the distance between the defects, is not sufficient to properly characterize the cluster. Indeed, beyond the number of point defects, the shape (loops, C15 and all kinds of imperfect structures) is also very important, raising the question of the classification of defects as shown for instance in [34,35]. Here, we describe in detail our methodology to be able to compare with the work reported in the literature, but the purpose here is not to propose a new methodology which would require a significant amount of statistics and which is out of the scope of the present study.…”
Section: Discussion 1) Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our work thus shows that the methodology used until now by many groups to identify two defects as belonging to the same cluster, which relies only on the distance between the defects, is not sufficient to properly characterize the cluster. Indeed, beyond the number of point defects, the shape (loops, C15 and all kinds of imperfect structures) is also very important, raising the question of the classification of defects as shown for instance in [34,35]. Here, we describe in detail our methodology to be able to compare with the work reported in the literature, but the purpose here is not to propose a new methodology which would require a significant amount of statistics and which is out of the scope of the present study.…”
Section: Discussion 1) Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work, we applied interatomic potentials based on the Gaussian Approximation Potential (GAP) framework to numerically model the damage in crystalline materials due to irradiation in a fusion reactor [12,19]. MD simulations were analyzed by a recently developed workflow for semi-automatic identification and classification of defects in crystalline structures and reported results are in good agreement with experimental data [20]. Therefore, the goal of the present work is to better understand the thermal activated mechanisms for material damage in crystalline W samples which is commonly used in experiments for irradiation in a fusion reactor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…This is followed by a computation of the nearest neighbor distance between the position of the damaged sample atoms and the sampling grid points. Points where the distance to the nearest atom exceeds a given threshold describe the spatial volume of the identified vacancy [16,17].…”
Section: Identification Of Point Defects and Vacanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once the DVs of all the atoms of the damaged material are computed, we calculate the distance between the two corresponding DVs, d = d ( q i , q j ) to the atomic local environment of a defect free and thermalized material sample [18,16] as follows…”
Section: Identification Of Point Defects and Vacanciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation