2021
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.21-299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Favorable Effects of Impella on Takotsubo Syndrome Complicated with Cardiogenic Shock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MCS with ECMELLA also provides LV unloading and full circulatory support, but evidence suggests that MCS with two devices is also associated with higher complication rates [ 22 ]. Recently published case reports and series [ 15 , 23 ] confirmed the pathophysiological assumed benefit of MCS support via Impella in TTS-CS and showed noteworthy survival rates and excellent myocardial recovery. These publications included cases in which Impella CP, Impella 2.5 and Impella 5.0 (only once) were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…MCS with ECMELLA also provides LV unloading and full circulatory support, but evidence suggests that MCS with two devices is also associated with higher complication rates [ 22 ]. Recently published case reports and series [ 15 , 23 ] confirmed the pathophysiological assumed benefit of MCS support via Impella in TTS-CS and showed noteworthy survival rates and excellent myocardial recovery. These publications included cases in which Impella CP, Impella 2.5 and Impella 5.0 (only once) were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Nishikawa et al . [ 3 ] reported that short-term improvement in myocardial haemodynamics with Impella is useful in patients with Takotsubo syndrome and cardiogenic shock. Several recent reports have demonstrated the usefulness of Impella as a preoperative circulatory aid in cardiac surgery or as an adjunct to percutaneous procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Impella seemed to provide an adequate amount of supplemental circulation, but it had to pass through the replaced aortic bioprosthetic valve, which could cause mechanical damage to the aortic valve, which we wanted to avoid. He also had to use heparin, which carries the risk of contributing to cerebral hemorrhage [4]. ECMO appeared to provide adequate supplemental circulating volume, but had the disadvantage of increased afterload to the left ventricle, and required heparin, which could have contributed to cerebral hemorrhage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%