Multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) is a phenomenon that appears to be increasing in frequency, perhaps as a result of improved resolution of cross-sectional imaging as well as an aging population of lung cancer survivors. 1,2 The diagnosis of MPLC remains complicated, however, because it must be distinguished from metastatic disease. Although criteria for identifying MPLC have been proposed and standardized, 3,4 we still lack reliable and robust means of clearly discriminating patients with MPLC from those with satellite lesions and other intrapulmonary foci of metastatic disease. 1,2 In their article in this issue of the Journal, Chen and colleagues 1 describe their experience with patients who underwent resection of 2 or more malignant pulmonary lesions, with widely accepted criteria used for MPLC (differing histologic type, or same histologic type with anatomic separation and N<2 M0). 1,3,4 The investigators divided the patients into subgroups, with group A including patients with only ground glass opacity (GGO)-dominant lesions, group B including patients who had primary solid nodules with additional secondary GGOs, and group C including patients whose primary and secondary lesions were all solid in nature. After extracting samples for RNA and DNA evaluation, the investigators assessed for somatic mutations in EGFR, TP53, PIK3CA, and BRAF genes, as well as EML4-ALK, ROS1, and RET fusions. Ultimately, Chen and colleagues 1 sought both to characterize differences in survival among the 3 groups and to examine extent of concordance among driver mutations between tumors within individual patients. In this well-written article, Chen and colleagues 1 describe several important findings. The 5-year recurrence-free survival was best for those with GGOs and worst for those with solid nodules (100%, 68%, and 51% in groups A, B, and C, respectively). Further, such results were paralleled on analysis of the overall 5-year survival (100%, 81%, and 60%, respectively). Chen and