A few tumor antigen (TA)-specific monoclonal antibodies (mAb) have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of several major malignant diseases and are commercially available. Once in the clinic, mAbs have an average success rate of ∼30% and are well tolerated. These results have changed the face of cancer therapy, bringing us closer to more specific and more effective biological therapy of cancer. The challenge facing tumor immunologists at present is represented by the identification of the mechanism(s) underlying the patients' differential clinical response to mAb-based immunotherapy. This information is expected to lead to the development of criteria to select patients to be treated with mAb-based immunotherapy. In the past, in vitro and in vivo evidence has shown that TAspecific mAbs can mediate their therapeutic effect by inducing tumor cell apoptosis, inhibiting the targeted antigen function, blocking tumor cell signaling, and/or mediating complement-or cell-dependent lysis of tumor cells. More recent evidence suggests that TA-specific mAb can induce TA-specific cytotoxic Tcell responses by enhancing TA uptake by dendritic cells and cross-priming of T cells. In this review, we briefly summarize the TA-specific mAbs that have received Food and Drug Administration approval. Next, we review the potential mechanisms underlying the therapeutic efficacy of TA-specific mAbs with emphasis on the induction of TA-specific cellular immune responses and their potential to contribute to the clinical efficacy of TA-specific mAb-based immunotherapy. Lastly, we discuss the potential negative effect of immune escape mechanisms on the clinical efficacy of TA-specific mAb-based immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res; 16(1); 11-20. ©2010 AACR.The concept that antibodies could be used for the treatment of malignant disease originated more than a century ago (1). The first generation of antibody-based therapies were based on the use of tumor antigen (TA)-specific allogeneic, autologous, or xenogeneic polyclonal antibodies, which were ill suited as cancer-specific therapies because of their limited or lack of specificity and reproducibility. It was not until the development of the hybridoma technology (2) that antibody-based immunotherapy of malignant diseases became a practical reality. The hybridoma technology enabled the production of a large number of human TA-specific murine monoclonal antibodies (mAb). The clinical application of some of them yielded a handful of promising results that were however overshadowed by disappointing outcomes in early clinical trials implemented with TA-specific mouse mAb in patients with various types of cancer (3). In hindsight, the inadequate response rates (RR) observed with first generation TA-specific mAb most likely reflected their murine origins, resulting in high immunogenicity and poor ability to recruit immune effector mechanisms (4-6). These hurdles have been recently overcome by the generation of chimeric, humanized, and human mAb, resulting in reduced or...