2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2940418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FCA-Net: Adversarial Learning for Skin Lesion Segmentation Based on Multi-Scale Features and Factorized Channel Attention

Abstract: Skin lesion segmentation in dermoscopic images is still a challenge due to the low contrast and fuzzy boundaries of lesions. Moreover, lesions have high similarity with the healthy regions in terms of appearance. In this paper, we propose an accurate skin lesion segmentation model based on a modified conditional generative adversarial network (cGAN). We introduce a new block in the encoder of cGAN called factorized channel attention (FCA), which exploits both channel attention mechanism and residual 1-D kernel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, there is a noteworthy phenomenon in Table 2 to 6 that a method on mJI is usually better than other methods while its mAC score is relatively poor than them, although better mAC and better mJI both indicate a better performance. This phenomenon does not merely occur in our experimental results, extensively existing in many previous works such as FCA-Net [15], SkinNet [34] and iMSCGnet [37], and there has been no reasonable explanation for it in community. It is known that the metrics mJI and mAC were both introduced in the official ISIC 2017 [21] and mJI was the finally decisive metric adopted, and the official had not explained the specific reasons.…”
Section: F Comparison With State Of the Artsmentioning
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, there is a noteworthy phenomenon in Table 2 to 6 that a method on mJI is usually better than other methods while its mAC score is relatively poor than them, although better mAC and better mJI both indicate a better performance. This phenomenon does not merely occur in our experimental results, extensively existing in many previous works such as FCA-Net [15], SkinNet [34] and iMSCGnet [37], and there has been no reasonable explanation for it in community. It is known that the metrics mJI and mAC were both introduced in the official ISIC 2017 [21] and mJI was the finally decisive metric adopted, and the official had not explained the specific reasons.…”
Section: F Comparison With State Of the Artsmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) 2017 Challenge [21] and 2018 Challenge [33] at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), most of top ranked participants took advantage of various dominated DCNN methods such as the FCNs model [8], Mask R-CNN [11] or their variations. In addition, some DCNN-based methods such as FCA-Net [15], SkinNet [34], PA-Net [35], FrCN [36], iMSCGnet [37] and Slsdeep [38] were proposed as well in recent years. These efforts were mainly based on some single model resolving the lesion segmentation problem on the global level upon whole training dataset.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these methods require an expert dermatologist. In recent years, dermatologists have used dermoscopy and microscopic images for diagnosing skin cancer [ 10 ]. The microscopic images have a low resolution and can be seen through mobile cameras.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned problems make skin lesion segmentation a challenging task. To address these problems, literature works that deploy different CNN architectures with multi-scale information [ 11 , 13 , 14 ], or multi-task learning framework [ 15 , 16 ] have been proposed for skin lesion segmentation. The core idea of these methods can be regarded as trying to use as much information as possible to make robust predictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%