2019
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2019-900087-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FCC-hh: The Hadron Collider

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
414
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 603 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 122 publications
4
414
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to illustrate such a phenomenology, we have defined several BPs, each embedding CP-violation, over the I(2+1)HDM parameter space, with varying mass splittings and coupling strengths in the inert sector, all compliant with available experimental data, from relic density, (in)direct DM searches and colliders. For three such BPs, we have quantified CP-violation effects entering three asymmetries which can all be defined in the qq → Z * → ZZ channel and measured at both the LHC (f = q) by the end of its lifetime (i.e., after the High Luminosity LHC [58,59] runs) and at future lepton colliders (f = e) such as the FCC-ee, ILC, CLiC or CEPC running at current design luminosities. Finally, we have illustrated that the hadronic cross sections are typically larger than the leptonic ones, so that it is quite possible that a first evidence of a CPviolating I(2+1)HDM will occur at the LHC rather than at the FCC-ee, ILC, CLiC or CEPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate such a phenomenology, we have defined several BPs, each embedding CP-violation, over the I(2+1)HDM parameter space, with varying mass splittings and coupling strengths in the inert sector, all compliant with available experimental data, from relic density, (in)direct DM searches and colliders. For three such BPs, we have quantified CP-violation effects entering three asymmetries which can all be defined in the qq → Z * → ZZ channel and measured at both the LHC (f = q) by the end of its lifetime (i.e., after the High Luminosity LHC [58,59] runs) and at future lepton colliders (f = e) such as the FCC-ee, ILC, CLiC or CEPC running at current design luminosities. Finally, we have illustrated that the hadronic cross sections are typically larger than the leptonic ones, so that it is quite possible that a first evidence of a CPviolating I(2+1)HDM will occur at the LHC rather than at the FCC-ee, ILC, CLiC or CEPC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ATLAS and CMS have also conducted searches for the LNV same-sign dilepton + jets channel, W ± → ± N, N → ± jj [58,59]. Above the Z boson mass limits can be improved in future by ATLAS and CMS during the high luminosity (L = 3 ab −1 ) LHC phase (HL-LHC) and by a future √ s = 27 or 100 TeV Future Circular Collider (FCC-hh) [60,61]. Around the Higgs mass, there are also some limits from the SM Higgs decay to sterile neutrinos [62].…”
Section: High-energy Collider Searchesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We briefly remark that the O(100) zb cross sections at √ s = 100 TeV are incredibly tiny. However, the proposed integrated luminosity goals for such potential machines are of L = 30 − 50 −1 ab [51][52][53][54][55], indicating that O(3 − 5) triplet pairs with masses of O(10) TeV could be produced in such a collider.…”
Section: Import Model Typeii_nlo_ufo Define P = G U C D S U~c~d~s4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of these impediments to studying the canonical Type II Seesaw model, we revisit the modeling of triplet Higgs boson production at current and proposed [51][52][53][54][55] hadron collider facilities. Though our work holds for all mass eigenstates arising from the scalar triplet field∆, for conciseness, we limit our investigation to the pair and associated production of the doubly charged scalar ∆ ±± .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%