2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12350-018-1398-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG PET/CT for the diagnosis and management of infective endocarditis: Expert consensus vs evidence-based practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…La PET-CT también puede ser útil en el seguimiento de estos pacientes en que basados en el valor estandarizado de captación máxima (SUVmáx), es posible decidir iniciar terapia antibiótica, aumentar la dosis o detener el tratamiento según otro estudio retrospectivo (4) . También ha demostrado utilidad en casos con sospecha de endocarditis aguda infecciosa (5) . En nuestro paciente, la PET-CT fue determinante en establecer el diagnóstico de infección sobre tubo protésico ante la incongruencia de hallazgos entre el ETE y la angio-TC de aorta.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…La PET-CT también puede ser útil en el seguimiento de estos pacientes en que basados en el valor estandarizado de captación máxima (SUVmáx), es posible decidir iniciar terapia antibiótica, aumentar la dosis o detener el tratamiento según otro estudio retrospectivo (4) . También ha demostrado utilidad en casos con sospecha de endocarditis aguda infecciosa (5) . En nuestro paciente, la PET-CT fue determinante en establecer el diagnóstico de infección sobre tubo protésico ante la incongruencia de hallazgos entre el ETE y la angio-TC de aorta.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Because a definitive diagnosis of endocarditis has important treatment consequences such as prolonged intravenous use of antibiotics or even cardiac valve replacement, additional imaging such as FDG-PET/CT or alternatively white blood cell scintigraphy is often performed. Although FDG-PET/CT has a relatively low sensitivity of approximately 14% in patients with native valve endocarditis, it has a high sensitivity of 71-100% in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis [30,31]. Nevertheless, FDG-PET/CT can still be valuable in native valve endocarditis for the detection of septic infection foci [30].…”
Section: Infective Endocarditismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although FDG-PET/CT has a relatively low sensitivity of approximately 14% in patients with native valve endocarditis, it has a high sensitivity of 71-100% in patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis [30,31]. Nevertheless, FDG-PET/CT can still be valuable in native valve endocarditis for the detection of septic infection foci [30]. In current European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis, FDG-PET/CT is only included as a diagnostic technique in patients with suspected, but not definite, prosthetic valve endocarditis [32].…”
Section: Infective Endocarditismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the United States to image cardiac device infection is probably even lower, as such use has not been endorsed in the U.S. guidelines and is not currently reimbursed for infection or inflammation imaging. Although most of the studies using 18 F-FDG PET/CT for cardiac device infection are retrospective, current clinical practice and expert consensus support the judicious use of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in the workup of cardiovascular device infection (24,25). Table 1 compares anatomic (TEE and CT/CTA) and functional ( 18 F-FDG PET/CT, WBC scanning) imaging modalities for evaluation of cardiovascular device infection.…”
Section: Functional Imaging Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%