2010
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00114708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG-PET in diagnostic work-up of pulmonary artery sarcomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is only sparse data on the role of F-18 FDG PET(/CT) for the imaging of primary sarcomas of the great vessels, mainly in patients with pulmonary artery involvement. However, the few cases reported in the literature are promising [13-16]. Ito et al reported on three patients with pulmonary artery sarcomas and demonstrated that the mean SUV max of 7.6 was significantly higher than in patients with pulmonary embolism [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is only sparse data on the role of F-18 FDG PET(/CT) for the imaging of primary sarcomas of the great vessels, mainly in patients with pulmonary artery involvement. However, the few cases reported in the literature are promising [13-16]. Ito et al reported on three patients with pulmonary artery sarcomas and demonstrated that the mean SUV max of 7.6 was significantly higher than in patients with pulmonary embolism [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wittram and Scott observed SUV max values in the range from 0.45 to 3.03 for acute pulmonary emboli, which is considerably lower than the SUV max values reported for pulmonary sarcomas [17]. Another small series of three patients was published by Tueller et al with an SUV max of 5.2 (reported only for one patient) [16]. Treglia et al recently reported an SUVmax of 13 for a primary pulmonary epitheloid angiosarcoma that presented as an intrapulmonary mass [18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8] FDG-PET may be useful in differentiating pulmonary thromboembolism and PAS, as blood thrombi do not take up 18 F-FDG, whereas a malignant tumor, such as PAS and does. [9] However, some reports indicate that PASs may not always show high FDG uptake. [10] Lung metastases occur in 50% and distance organs in 16%, including kidney, lymph nodes, brain, and skin, often detected at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT is useful in identifying a pulmonary artery lesion as malignant if the luminal lesion has high FDG uptake [33] and is useful in preoperative evaluation [34]. It is also very useful in identifying active vasculitis in patients with pulmonary vasculitis such as Takayasu’s arteritis [35] and monitoring response to immunosuppressive treatment [36].…”
Section: Acquisition Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%