2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)03175-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FDG-PET lymph node staging and survival of patients with FIGO stage IIIB cervical carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[28][29][30] The role of PET-CT to detect lymph nodal metastasis has been studied in various centers and the results are promising. [31][32][33][34][35] In a case of radical surgery, pathological assessment of lymph nodes will be possible. Alternatively, there may be a practice/capability for imaging-guided fine needle aspiration cytology.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28][29][30] The role of PET-CT to detect lymph nodal metastasis has been studied in various centers and the results are promising. [31][32][33][34][35] In a case of radical surgery, pathological assessment of lymph nodes will be possible. Alternatively, there may be a practice/capability for imaging-guided fine needle aspiration cytology.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(15) On the contrary, the recent studies have reported that positron emission tomography (PET or PET ⁄ CT), employing [ 18 F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG), is more sensitive than CT or MRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer. (16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) Numerous studies have described the use of CT, MRI, and PET or PET ⁄ CT for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer, but no studies have compared these three imaging modalities for those patients. Some previous studies have compared PET and MRI and suggested that PET is more accurate than MRI, but the statistical power of the comparisons was too low to assess the significance of this difference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incidence of paraaortic lymph node metastases increases with tumour stage (IB 6%; IIB 19%; IIIB 29%; V 30%) (Nibe et al 2003;Ahmed et al 2004). The Gynecologic Oncology Group identified paraaortic lymph node metastases and tumour size as the two most significant prognostic factors regarding survival (Singh et al 2003). Furthermore, lymph node metastases have major impact on the risk of local and distant cancer recurrence as well as disease-specific survival (Munkarah 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If supraclavicular lymph nodes are positive, the survival rate is even worse (mean 10-12 months, maximum 17 months). Non-nodal distant metastatic sites are lung, liver and bone (Grigsby et al 1999;Singh et al 2003). Aggressive therapy is an option to control pelvic disease, but all patients finally develop distant metastases and will die from their disease.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation