2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsearthspacechem.7b00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe(II)–Fe(III) Electron Transfer in a Clay Mineral with Low Fe Content

Abstract: Newcastle University ePrints -eprint.ncl.ac.uk Latta DE, Neumann A, Premaratne WAPJ, Scherer MM. Fe(II) -Fe(III) electron transfer in a clay mineral with low Fe content. Earth and Space Chemistry 2017, http://doi.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

7
52
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
7
52
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The data also indicated an increase in the amount of para-Fe(II) of 60 mmol Fe •kg −1 , which is consistent with the observed increase in total Fe of 40-50 mmol Fe •kg −1 . In this case, the observed changes in Fe speciation and content (along with the blue color) are explained by the presence of additional Fe 2+ from the corroding heater, which can be attributed to ferrous hydroxide, sorbed Fe 2+ , and/or sorbed Fe 3+ following sorption of Fe 2+ and reduction of clay structural Fe 3+ (Gehin et al 2007;Soltermann et al 2013;Latta et al 2017). Data collected from sample OB11 (59 mm from the interface, at the transition between the orange and blue zones) indicated an increase in total Fe of 45 mmol Fe •kg −1 relative to the outermost samples, similar to that in previous samples B15 and B20.…”
Section: Febex Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The data also indicated an increase in the amount of para-Fe(II) of 60 mmol Fe •kg −1 , which is consistent with the observed increase in total Fe of 40-50 mmol Fe •kg −1 . In this case, the observed changes in Fe speciation and content (along with the blue color) are explained by the presence of additional Fe 2+ from the corroding heater, which can be attributed to ferrous hydroxide, sorbed Fe 2+ , and/or sorbed Fe 3+ following sorption of Fe 2+ and reduction of clay structural Fe 3+ (Gehin et al 2007;Soltermann et al 2013;Latta et al 2017). Data collected from sample OB11 (59 mm from the interface, at the transition between the orange and blue zones) indicated an increase in total Fe of 45 mmol Fe •kg −1 relative to the outermost samples, similar to that in previous samples B15 and B20.…”
Section: Febex Samplesmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Fe 2+ diffusion into bentonite is generally considered to occur during the anaerobic period and will mainly interact with the bentonite medium through ion exchange on basal surfaces (Xia et al 2005;Wilson et al 2015) and sorption to edge sites (Gehin et al 2007;Soltermann et al 2013;Muurinen et al 2014;Latta et al 2017). A monophasic diffusion of Fe 2+ could, therefore, be expected.…”
Section: A Phenomenological Description Of the Fe Diffusion Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2 Over the last decade significant evidence has accumulated to demonstrate interfacial electron transfer between sorbed Fe(II) and Fe(III) in Fe oxides and Fe-containing clay minerals. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In some cases, electron transfer also appears to be followed by mixing of Fe atoms from the bulk mineral structure with the surrounding fluid (also termed Fe(II)-catalyzed recrystallization). 10,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] While Fe(II)-Fe(III) electron transfer and mixing have been clearly demonstrated, a mechanistic understanding of these reactions remains elusive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%