2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2020.119901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe(II)-induced transformation of iron minerals in soil ferromanganese nodules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…During the photoreduction of iron (hydr)­oxides, photoelectrons derived from minerals or external sources can reduce Fe­(III), changing the charge distribution and decreasing the stability of the crystal, which may accelerate the transformation of iron (hydr)­oxides (e.g., ferrihydrite). , In addition, dissolution is an essential step in some phase transformations among iron (hydr)­oxides, such as the transformation of ferrihydrite to goethite by dissolution and recrystallization. , As the Fe­(II)–O bond is more labile than the Fe­(III)–O bond, the dissolution of iron (hydr)­oxides can be accelerated by reduction processes and hence benefit the formation of goethite . Previous studies also suggested that aqueous Fe­(II) can be the catalyst for the recrystallization of iron (hydr)­oxides, such as goethite. ,,, Under UV irradiation, Schwertmannite was rapidly transformed to goethite in the presence of oxalate (2 mM) (Figure ). , When the concentration of oxalate is higher (5 or 10 mM), the product of the photoinduced phase transformation turns out to be humboldtine (Figure ).…”
Section: Geochemical Significance Of Photoreductive Dissolution Of Ir...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the photoreduction of iron (hydr)­oxides, photoelectrons derived from minerals or external sources can reduce Fe­(III), changing the charge distribution and decreasing the stability of the crystal, which may accelerate the transformation of iron (hydr)­oxides (e.g., ferrihydrite). , In addition, dissolution is an essential step in some phase transformations among iron (hydr)­oxides, such as the transformation of ferrihydrite to goethite by dissolution and recrystallization. , As the Fe­(II)–O bond is more labile than the Fe­(III)–O bond, the dissolution of iron (hydr)­oxides can be accelerated by reduction processes and hence benefit the formation of goethite . Previous studies also suggested that aqueous Fe­(II) can be the catalyst for the recrystallization of iron (hydr)­oxides, such as goethite. ,,, Under UV irradiation, Schwertmannite was rapidly transformed to goethite in the presence of oxalate (2 mM) (Figure ). , When the concentration of oxalate is higher (5 or 10 mM), the product of the photoinduced phase transformation turns out to be humboldtine (Figure ).…”
Section: Geochemical Significance Of Photoreductive Dissolution Of Ir...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…226 Previous studies also suggested that aqueous Fe(II) can be the catalyst for the recrystallization of iron (hydr)oxides, such as goethite. 222,223,227,228 Under UV irradiation, Schwertmannite was rapidly transformed to goethite in the presence of oxalate (2 mM) (Figure 8). 45,47 When the concentration of oxalate is higher (5 or 10 mM), the product of the photoinduced phase transformation turns out to be humboldtine (Figure 8).…”
Section: Ros In the Following Stepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mimic environmentally relevant Fe(II) concentrations, the ratios of Fe(II) spike to native soil Fe were 0.072 and 0.238 mol/mol for LCZO and CCZO soils, respectively. Because the Fe(II) spike consisted primarily of 57 Fe, the f 57 Fe values of Fe(II) aq were used to calculate the relative amount of Fe atoms in native soil Fe minerals that exchanged with the Fe(II) aq by using a mass balance approach: 27,62,63 (1)…”
Section: ■ Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To mimic environmentally relevant Fe(II) concentrations, the ratios of Fe(II) spike to native soil Fe were 0.072 and 0.238 mol/mol for LCZO and CCZO soils, respectively. Because the Fe(II) spike consisted primarily of 57 Fe, the f 57 Fe values of Fe(II) aq were used to calculate the relative amount of Fe atoms in native soil Fe minerals that exchanged with the Fe(II) aq by using a mass balance approach: ,, Fe atom exchange (%) = N normala normalq [ f a q i f F e false( normalI normalI false) t ] N normals normalo normali normall normalt normalo normalt [ f F e false( normalI normalI false) t f s o i l i ] × 100 where N aq is the total number of moles of Fe(II) aq in the solution, N soil tot is the total number of moles of native soil Fe(III), f aq i is the initial isotopic fraction of Fe(II) aq , f soil i is the initial isotopic fraction of native soil Fe, and f Fe(II) t is the isotopic fraction of Fe(II) aq at reaction time t .…”
Section: Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Подводная фауна районов железомарганцевых конкреций. ЖМК представляют собой новый вид минерального сырья, который содержит стратегически значимые металлы для черной (Mn) и цветной (Ni, Cu, Co) металлургии, по содержанию и ресурсному потенциалу не уступающие эксплуатируемым наземным рудным объектам, выгодно отличающиеся от них комплексным составом и сорбционными свойствами [8].…”
unclassified