2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsl.2014.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fe isotope fractionation during phase separation in the NaCl–H2O system: An experimental study with implications for seafloor hydrothermal vents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with observed changes in 527 the Fe isotopic composition of vapors collected during Exp. 4 (Syverson et al, 2014). and Central Indian Ridge, CIR).…”
Section: Potentially Dominant Chloro-complexes 461 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with observed changes in 527 the Fe isotopic composition of vapors collected during Exp. 4 (Syverson et al, 2014). and Central Indian Ridge, CIR).…”
Section: Potentially Dominant Chloro-complexes 461 16mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to fluid-rock interactions, phase separation of hydrothermal fluid influences the chemical and isotopic flux of dissolved components to the seafloor (Von Damm, 1995Damm, , 2004. Elemental partitioning and isotopic fractionation at pressure-temperature conditions representative of natural hydrothermal systems have been previously studied experimentally for a range of transition metals, alkali and alkali earth elements (Berndt et al, 1996;Heinrich et al, 1999;Liebscher et al, 2005Liebscher et al, , 2006Foustoukos and Seyfried, 2007b;Rempel et al, 2012;Pokrovski et al, 2013;Syverson et al, 2014;Pester et al, 2015). These studies provide the solubility and isotopic constraints necessary to interpret field data taken from two-phase submarine (Foustoukos et al, 2004;Rouxel et al, 2004Rouxel et al, , 2008 and subaerial (Simmons and Brown, 2006;Hardardó ttir et al, 2009) hydrothermal systems, while also serving as independent checks on first principle calculations of isotopic fractionation (Anbar et al, 2005;Chialvo and Horita, 2009;Rustad et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies provide the solubility and isotopic constraints necessary to interpret field data taken from two-phase submarine (Foustoukos et al, 2004;Rouxel et al, 2004Rouxel et al, , 2008 and subaerial (Simmons and Brown, 2006;Hardardó ttir et al, 2009) hydrothermal systems, while also serving as independent checks on first principle calculations of isotopic fractionation (Anbar et al, 2005;Chialvo and Horita, 2009;Rustad et al, 2010). Additionally, isotopic studies of twophase fluid systems are useful to identify changes in aqueous speciation between vapor and liquid, given that, for many elements, the bonding and coordination environment in either phase often prefers one isotope relative to others (Liebscher et al, 2005(Liebscher et al, , 2006Rempel et al, 2012;Syverson et al, 2014). For example, Syverson et al (2014) proposed that Fe isotope fractionation was caused by two distinct Fe species, [FeCl 2 (H 2 O) 2 ] 0 and [FeCl 4 ] 2À , coexisting in the vapor and liquid, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the fluid phase separation period, the gas phase depleted in Cl was likely enriched in heavy Fe isotopes. 0 preferentially entered the gas phase [63]. Theoretical calculations indicated that the degree of Fe isotope fractionation caused by the difference between the coordination chemistry of Fe-Cl and Fe-H 2 O complexes is likely caused by an oxidization-reduction effect [81].…”
Section: Phase Separation Of Hydrothermal Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies included simulated experiments on variations in the Fe isotope compositions of hydrothermal fluid systems during the phase separation period at seafloor hydrothermal vents within a temperature range of 424 to 466 ∘ C and a pressure range of 35.2 to 24.7 MPa [63]. When the solution system did not exhibit phase separation, the 56 Fe value was −0.29 ± 0.03‰ (2 ).…”
Section: Phase Separation Of Hydrothermal Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%