2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FE simulation of hydrogen diffusion in duplex stainless steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N T denotes the number of traps per unit volume and θ T the occupancy of the trap sites. Here, focus will be placed on reversible trapping sites at microstructural defects generated by plastic straining -dislocations; a key ingredient in the mechanics of hydrogen diffusion [11,12]. A phenomenological relation between the trap density and the equivalent plastic strain is established based on the permeation tests by Kumnick and Johnson [14],…”
Section: Coupled Mechanical-diffusion Through the Analogy With Heat Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N T denotes the number of traps per unit volume and θ T the occupancy of the trap sites. Here, focus will be placed on reversible trapping sites at microstructural defects generated by plastic straining -dislocations; a key ingredient in the mechanics of hydrogen diffusion [11,12]. A phenomenological relation between the trap density and the equivalent plastic strain is established based on the permeation tests by Kumnick and Johnson [14],…”
Section: Coupled Mechanical-diffusion Through the Analogy With Heat Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table shows the calculated results and the hydrogen diffusion coefficient is much larger than other works . This should be due to two factors, one is that the pre‐charging process was applied before hydrogen permeation test; the other one is the irreversible trapping effect introduced into the new model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Table 1 shows the calculated results and the hydrogen diffusion coefficient is much larger than other works. [40,41] This should be due to two factors, one is that the pre-charging process was applied before hydrogen permeation test; the other one is the irreversible trapping effect introduced into the new model. The diffusivity is also calculated by the normal Fick's second law and the order of magnitudes of the results are very close to the other work (10 −13 m 2 s −1 ), which means the trapping part in the modified model affect the value of Figure 4a the apparent hydrogen diffusion coefficient declines with increasing hydrostatic pressure.…”
Section: Hydrogen Concentration Determinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Similar to the approach adopted in (Rimoli and Ortiz, 2010), (Serebrinsky et al 2004), (Sofronis and McMeeking, 1989), (Scheider et al 2008), (Alvaro et al 2014a), (Olden et al 2014) and (Raykar et al 2011), hydrogen adsorption is treated by the application of appropriate boundary conditions. Fracture initiation due to the SCC hydrogen AIDEC mechanism is described by using the Fisher grain boundary diffusion model (Fisher, 1951).…”
Section: Current Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (Rimoli and Ortiz, 2010), it is widely reckoned that these interactions are not entirely understood at present, and, as argued in (Scheider et al, 2008), it is not currently possible to obtain a direct measure of hydrogen concentration in the region adjacent to the crack tip. As described in (Serebrinsky et al, 2004) and in (Sofronis and McMeeking, 1989), an alternative approach, adopted in different studies, such as (Scheider et al, 2008), (Raykar et al, 2011), (Alvaro et al, 2014a) and (Olden et al, 2014), consists in assuming that hydrogen adsorption can be represented via appropriate boundary conditions. For this purpose, the concept of hydrogen coverage is introduced and defined as:…”
Section: Hydrogen Coverage Boundary Conditionmentioning
confidence: 99%