2013
DOI: 10.3233/jae-131653
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FEA of electromagnetic forming using a new coupling algorithm

Abstract: Finite element modeling of electromagnetic forming includes modeling of mechanical aspects, modeling of electromagnetic aspects, and a coupling method between the two models. The electromagnetic problem is to determine the magnetic pressure and its temporal and spatial distribution. Whereas the mechanical problem is to find out workpiece deformation resulting from the magnetic pressure applied on this workpiece. Nonetheless complications in the simulation exist due to pressure variation with workpiece deformat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analytical method [1][2][3][4][5][6] is commonly preferred due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, they are only suited for linear system with simple structures and low frequencies.…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical method [1][2][3][4][5][6] is commonly preferred due to its simplicity and efficiency. However, they are only suited for linear system with simple structures and low frequencies.…”
Section: Intoductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rui et al 9 utilized elasto-plastic 3D FEA with the modified Drucker-Prager Cap model in ABAQUS to simulate the compaction process and predict the residual stress of green PM compacts of Distaloy AE. Ali et al 10 addressed the challenges in finite element (FE) modeling of EM forming by introducing an improved loose coupling algorithm that considers deformation effects on pressure, enhancing simulation accuracy and efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The enhanced formability is mainly attributed to the localised forming, which changes the damage and fracture behaviours of metal sheet compared with conventional processes such as stamping and deep drawing [1]. While enhanced formability was reported for high-speed forming techniques such as electromagnetic forming [2][3][4], the superiority of SPIF lies in the precise control of deformed shape with simple tooling. Due to the lengthy manufacturing time per part, the SPIF method is best suited for prototypes or limited production runs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%