1984
DOI: 10.1080/23808985.1984.11678581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fear-Arousing Persuasive Messages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
161
1
11

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(185 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
12
161
1
11
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found no support for Hypothesis 2b which proposed that adaptive intentions would be lower for younger males. The absence of any significant effects for age is somewhat surprising given that there is considerable evidence that suggests that threat appeals are least effective with adolescents and young people (Boster & Mongeau, 1984;de Meyrick, 2001;Pechmann, Zhao, Goldberg, & Reibling, 2003). However, the results are consistent with Witte and Allen's (2000) finding that most individual difference variables such as age generally do not have any effect on the acceptance of fear appeal recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we found no support for Hypothesis 2b which proposed that adaptive intentions would be lower for younger males. The absence of any significant effects for age is somewhat surprising given that there is considerable evidence that suggests that threat appeals are least effective with adolescents and young people (Boster & Mongeau, 1984;de Meyrick, 2001;Pechmann, Zhao, Goldberg, & Reibling, 2003). However, the results are consistent with Witte and Allen's (2000) finding that most individual difference variables such as age generally do not have any effect on the acceptance of fear appeal recommendations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Surprisingly, despite the frequency with which threat appeals are utilised in health advertising, a substantial body of literature spanning over five decades attests to contradictory findings regarding the manner in which fear is related to persuasion (for a range of reviews and empirical studies see, Bennett, 1996;Boster & Mongeau, 1984;Higbee, 1969;Janis, 1967;Janis & Feshbach, 1953;Elliott, 2003;Haefner, 1956;Insko, Arkoff, & Insko, 1965;King & Reid, 1990;Kohn et al, 1982;LaTour & Rotfeld, 1997;Leventhal 1970;Leventhal & Watts, 1966;Ray & Wilkie, 1970;Sternthal & Craig, 1981;Sutton, 1982;Sutton, 1992, Witte, Berkowitz, Cameron, & McKeon, 1998. More specifically, early fear-persuasion studies provided empirical support for a direct positive relationship between fear and persuasion (e.g., Higbee, 1969;Insko et al, 1965;Leventhal & Watts, 1966) as well as a direct negative relationship (e.g., Haefner, 1956;Janis & Feshbach, 1953).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moderating effects of trait anxiety on fear appeal were previously suggested by e.g., Boster and Mongeau's (1984) and rejected by Witte and Morrison (2000). Our results support this moderating effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Although some meta-analyses have found that highinvolvement people react favorably to moderate levels of fear (Keller and Lehmann 2008), other research has indicated that highly motivated people may require only low levels of fear, whereas the uninvolved may require high levels (Keller and Block 1996). Overall, however, independent meta-analyses have concluded that, in general, higher levels of fear lead to greater persuasion (Boster and Mongeau 1984;Witte and Allen 2000).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%