2017
DOI: 10.1215/10642684-3818477
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fear of a Queer Plant?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a wealth of feminist, queer and decolonial scholarship emerging which offers politically engaged correctives to earlier plant thought, rehabilitating the plant through situated intersectional analyses (e.g. Myers, 2017a; Gibson and Brits, 2018; Sandilands, 2017; Szczygielska and Cielemęcka, 2019). Importantly, the history of plant-human interaction is a heavily gendered one; whilst certain authors have attended to these relations (see in particular Shteir, 1996; Schiebinger, 2004), the close collaborations between women and plants have long been underacknowledged.…”
Section: Critical Plant Studies: a Cross-cultural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a wealth of feminist, queer and decolonial scholarship emerging which offers politically engaged correctives to earlier plant thought, rehabilitating the plant through situated intersectional analyses (e.g. Myers, 2017a; Gibson and Brits, 2018; Sandilands, 2017; Szczygielska and Cielemęcka, 2019). Importantly, the history of plant-human interaction is a heavily gendered one; whilst certain authors have attended to these relations (see in particular Shteir, 1996; Schiebinger, 2004), the close collaborations between women and plants have long been underacknowledged.…”
Section: Critical Plant Studies: a Cross-cultural Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the posthumanist rush to embrace notions of plant intelligence and communication-which, in general terms, tend to demonstrate that plants are "like" people in fundamental waysthere has been a tendency to overlook the biopolitical context in which these new knowledges arise: the relations of appropriation, expropriation, dispossession, and exploitation in which both plants, and Indigenous relationships to plants, are enmeshed. This has been the focus of a lot of my recent writing (Sandilands, 2016(Sandilands, , 2017(Sandilands, , 2018: What does it mean that we are talking about plant intelligence in a way that makes more and more plant capacities (e.g., communication by way of volatile organic compounds) open to commodification and exploitation, rather than in a way that takes genuine inspiration from thinkers like Kimmerer who insist on the ethical primacy of relationship and reciprocity in our dealings with vegetal "kin"?…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In some respects, the pastoral tendency in queer art to escape majoritarian intolerance by finding solace and retreat in the rural wilderness has been replaced with an urban ideal where ruins and spontaneous vegetation physically shield queer spaces from the surrounding city. Recent work in queer ecology has drawn attention to ‘the collaborative role of weeds in forming human sexuality’ (Crowdy, 2017, p. 429) either as ‘inadvertent allies to the marginalized’ (Nowak & Roynesdal, 2021, p. 3), or as ‘complex queer agents that demand attention to specific entanglements of sex, gender, race, and species’ (Sandilands, 2017, p. 421). Earlier queer ecological studies of urban sites have focused on cruising (Gandy, 2012; Patrick, 2014), yet Berlin's club islands also draw attention to a broader set of immersions, including dancing under the trees and experiencing urban nature under the influence of empathy‐enhancing drugs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%