2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.09.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fear, vulnerability and sacrifice: Drivers of emergency department use and implications for policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, this study is one of only a handful of recent studies that relied on interviews with frequent ED user populations to understand care needs (Capp et al, 2016;Mautner et al, 2013;Poremski et al, 2016). Other previous studies that included both frequent and nonfrequent ED users have highlighted some factors associated with ED use that our study findings support, including fear and uncertainty about symptoms and difficulty accessing outpatient care (Hudgins & Rising, 2016;Rising et al, 2015). Another study highlighted the similarity of self-reported motives for ED visits between frequent and nonfrequent ED users; these findings are also in line with findings from the present study, including access, convenience, cost, quality, and perceived need for urgent care (Doran, Colucci, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, this study is one of only a handful of recent studies that relied on interviews with frequent ED user populations to understand care needs (Capp et al, 2016;Mautner et al, 2013;Poremski et al, 2016). Other previous studies that included both frequent and nonfrequent ED users have highlighted some factors associated with ED use that our study findings support, including fear and uncertainty about symptoms and difficulty accessing outpatient care (Hudgins & Rising, 2016;Rising et al, 2015). Another study highlighted the similarity of self-reported motives for ED visits between frequent and nonfrequent ED users; these findings are also in line with findings from the present study, including access, convenience, cost, quality, and perceived need for urgent care (Doran, Colucci, et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Another study highlighted the similarity of self-reported motives for ED visits between frequent and nonfrequent ED users; these findings are also in line with findings from the present study, including access, convenience, cost, quality, and perceived need for urgent care (Doran, Colucci, et al, 2014). Previously identified interventions to decrease ED use and increase use of outpatient care have included a focus on structural solutions such as insurance coverage and use of community health workers (Hudgins & Rising, 2016), increasing use of formal medical training models for providers to improve screening and understanding of appropriate variations in care and hospital admission decisions for homeless patients (Doran, Curry, et al, 2014;Salhi et al, 2017). Our findings add the perspective of frequent users who are also homeless, a particularly vulnerable patient population with intersecting challenges that make treatment and engagement in services particularly difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While clinicians feel safe discharging a patient with negative test results, believing that testing did not reveal any cause for emergent treatment or admission, this news may produce the opposite effect in patients due to this diagnostic uncertainty and fear of the unknown cause of their complaints. This lack of diagnostic certainty may lead patients to return to the ED in the hope of finding an answer or out of fear if the symptoms return 2022. The psychological component experienced by patients during their ED encounters is often overlooked and is a potential area of focus for study and improvement.…”
Section: Risk Factors Reported In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Studies exploring reasons for return ED visits have identified high levels of patient uncertainty related to lack of a definitive diagnosis as one cause for return. [2][3][4] These findings suggest the…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 63%