2018
DOI: 10.1115/1.4040931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility Analysis of Energy Storage Technologies in Power Systems for Arid Region

Abstract: The benefits of energy storage technologies (ESTs) as a step of managing the future energy demand, by considering the case of electric power systems (EPS) in arid regions, were the focus of this study. The evaluation of different forms of ESTs' integration into the existing EPS, especially those with higher potential for solving issues related to the optimization of the power supply and high demands at peak loads, was carried out. Two interactive programs—ESCT and ES-Select—were utilized in the feasibility stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It enables us to see the trade-offs between the energy storage systems. [15]). Reproduced with permission from [15].…”
Section: Introduction To Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It enables us to see the trade-offs between the energy storage systems. [15]). Reproduced with permission from [15].…”
Section: Introduction To Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2. Maturity curve of various energy storage technologies depicting the demonstration phase of the supercapacitor devices (Source: Schlumberger Business Consulting (SBC) Energy Institute, 2015,[15]). Reproduced with permission from[15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike secondary batteries, SCs exhibit higher power densities (500-10,000 W kg -1 for SCs vs < 1000 W kg −1 for batteries), shorter CD period (1-10 s for SCs vs 0.5-5 h for batteries), superior lifespan (>500 000 h for SCs vs 500-1000 h for batteries) and improved operational safety. [3,5,[42][43][44][45] Nevertheless, the lower energy density of SCs (1-10 Wh kg −1 ) than batteries (10-100 Wh kg -1 ) is a major limitation to their commercial viability. [15,45,46] Among the potential strategies of circumventing the problem of inferior energy delivery of SCs, the development of novel high-performance electrode materials forms an effective and facile approach that has been extensively pursued.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, EESs are expensive and amount to the economic viability of the overall system [9]. Super inductors, ultracapacitors, flywheels, and fuel cells are various commonly accessible ESSs [10], [11]. Amongst the stated storage systems, Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) is less costly and delivers capable results when incorporated with RE systems [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%