Feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program for patients undergoing major cancer surgery: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Objective To establish the feasibility and acceptability of a preoperative exercise program, and to obtain pilot data on the likely difference in key surgical outcomes to inform the sample size calculation for a full-scale trial. Design Pilot randomized controlled trial. Setting Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia. Subjects We included patients undergoing elective pelvic exenteration or cytoreductive surgery aged 18 to 80 years, who presented to the participating gastrointestinal surgeon at least 2 weeks prior to surgery. Patients presenting cognitive impairment, co-morbidity preventing participation in exercise, inadequate English language, currently participating in an exercise program or unable to attend the exercise program sessions were excluded. Methods Participants were randomized to a 2–6 weeks preoperative, face-to-face, individualised exercise program or to usual care. Feasibility was assessed with consent rates to the study, and for the intervention group, retention and adherence rates to the preoperative exercise program. Acceptability of the exercise program was assessed with a semi-structured questionnaire exploring the advice received and the amount, duration and intensity of the exercise program. In addition, postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo), length of hospital stay and self-reported measures of health-related quality of life (SF-36v2) were collected at baseline, day before surgery and in-hospital up to discharge from hospital. Results Of 122 patients screened, 26 (21%) were eligible and 22 (85%) accepted to participate in the trial and were randomized to the intervention (11; 50%) or control group (11; 50%). The median age of the include participants was 63 years. Adherence to the preoperative exercise sessions was 92.7%, with all participants either satisfied (33%) or extremely satisfied (67%) with the overall design of the preoperative exercise program. No significant differences in outcomes were found between groups. Conclusions The results of our pilot trial demonstrate that a preoperative exercise program is feasible and acceptable to patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. There is an urgent need for a definite trial investigating the effectiveness of a preoperative exercise program on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal cancer surgery. This could potentially reduce postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay and subsequently overall health care costs. Trial registration ACTRN12617001129370. Registered on August 1, 2017, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=373396&showOriginal=true&isReview=true

Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study

“…Whilst this study does not assess the long-term trajectories of physical function, the improvement from postoperative day 10 to discharge supports the previously described patient-reported outcomes [11,39]. Mounting evidence supporting postoperative functional decline following exenterative surgery also warrants further research and implementation of preoperative interventions, such as prehabilitation [40][41][42][43][44]. In fact, we are currently planning a randomized control trial to examine the impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes in the context of oncological surgery [45].…”

Is there evidence behind pre- or perioperative cognitive training in gynaecological patients on the prevention of perioperative cognitive dysfunction? A review

“…No special cognitive training was scheduled. This was also the case for Steffens et al 's trial [15]. Both trails had only individualised physical training sessions for the participants.…”

Feasibility and effectiveness of exercise-based prehabilitation in patients opting for elective abdominal surgeries: A pre-post study

“…According to a previous study, patients who were given prehabilitation activities face-toface had a higher adherence rate of 93%, compared to 64% for those given prehabilitation exercises as unsupervised home exercises. 40 Lack of social support from family and friends and the patient's lack of belief in the merits of the exercises have been identified as plausible factors for low adherence in prior trials when prehabilitation was available. 41 Adverse events were not reported in our study.…”