Recently, the number of neuroimaging studies of CRT using single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), nearinfrared spectroscopy (NIRS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and functional MRI (fMRI) have increased to investigate the neural mechanisms underlying cognitive improvement. To date, several neuroimaging systematic reviews have indicated neuroanatomical changes upon CRT. [36][37][38] The use of different tools and approaches of neuroimaging devices and of CRT intensity and duration of CRT, however, has led meta-analyses to produce different results. The objective of this review was therefore to explore the impacts of different CRT protocols on neurobiology (Table 2). [39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] Training approaches Cognitive remediation therapy aims to improve cognitive impairment using several instructional techniques such as errorless learning, scaffolding, self-monitoring, and direct instruction. 51,52 Different CRT approaches can be divided into two types of training: bottom-up or top-down. The bottom-up approach focuses on component cognitive ability, such as attention, perceptual processing, and sensory discrimination, which are related to higher-order cognitive dysfunction, such as executive function, complex function, and metacognition, in one-Attention (ES = 0.31) Working memory (ES = 0.38) ES, effect size.