Feasibility and Effectiveness of Different Models of Team-Based Learning Approaches in STEMM-Based Disciplines

Abstract

This study presents findings from three different disciplines in STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics and Medicine) and across different models of student-focused teaching. Specifically, we assessed the feasibility and effectiveness of flipped classroom approaches combined with team based learning (TBL), and TBL alone within STEMM, particularly in the disciplines of Physics, Engineering and Medicine across different year levels. TBL activities were incorporated into undergraduate Physics and Engineering cohorts, with students from a diverse range of majors and backgrounds and a graduate level Doctor of Medicine (MD) cohort. Quiz scores from the Physics cohort were significantly improved following TBL, exam scores from the engineering cohort were more evenly distributed than pre-TBL quiz scores and students in the medical cohort had higher quiz scores when working within teams rather than alone. Qualitative survey responses from both the physics and engineering cohorts indicated that students felt TBL was positive and increased their understanding of key concepts. Informal feedback from medical students following TBL classes was also very positive and students demonstrated obvious engagement. Comparisons for pre-versus post-TBL quiz scores for Physics, for pre-TBL quartile versus exam scores in Engineering and for Team versus Individual learning quiz scores in Medicine all provide evidence of effective student engagement and performance. The observation study suggests that TBL is a feasible and effective method of student-focused learning within STEMM. More rigorously designed studies are now required to further explore these findings.

Developing Professional Skills of the Convict through Entrepreneurship Education

“…In this sense, Meaningful Learning complements this method, since it is known that the object to be learned has meaning for the learner, and that the learner shows willingness to relate the new object to the cognitive structure that they already have. Thus, learning becomes more attractive because the results are felt and internalized by the learner (Knowles et al, 1986;Crawford, 2008;Lin & Chuang, 2018;Parappilly et al, 2019;Schuster et al, 2018).…”

Team-based learning in physics courses

“…Parappilly and her colleagues apply TBL pedagogy in introductory physics courses for engineering students and physics courses for nonscience majors. Parappilly substitutes 4 traditional activities and replaces them with TBL activities in her courses [9] and reports positive learning outcomes.…”

Planting a Soft Skills Seed in a First-Year Introductory Programming Class Using Team-Based Learning

“…In recent years, TBL implementation has slowly shifted to engineering-related fields and in freshman-level classes [5,8,1,4]. Until now, TBL has been correlated with a dramatic decrease in first-semester class drop rate as well as a drastic increase in overall grade improvement [1,4,6,9,11]. Even so, not only has it shown evidence of improving student learning and student retention in specific degree programs, but it also shows potential in developing students' teamwork, communication, and other professional skills [3,4,6,2,11].…”

“…Even so, not only has it shown evidence of improving student learning and student retention in specific degree programs, but it also shows potential in developing students' teamwork, communication, and other professional skills [3,4,6,2,11]. Because it shifts away from the traditional lecture and instead utilizes lecture time for group work and discussion of class materials, TBL has been said to increase student engagement, enthusiasm, and group performance in addition to learning and understanding [3,8,9]. It is not uncommon for many students to have had poor teamwork experiences in past traditional lecture-based courses and other experiences.…”