2020
DOI: 10.1080/09638237.2020.1818702
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Feasibility evaluation of psychosocial intervention for internally displaced youth in Kenya

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies should also evaluate the adaptation of this intervention for different types of literacy, and its implementation with different vulnerable groups such as refugee children. Although no culture-specific suggestions were made by the participants in this study, implementation in various sociocultural contexts would improve our understanding of requirements for cultural adaptation [49]. Indeed, previous research showed that SEL programmes can be tailored to different cultural groups [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Further studies should also evaluate the adaptation of this intervention for different types of literacy, and its implementation with different vulnerable groups such as refugee children. Although no culture-specific suggestions were made by the participants in this study, implementation in various sociocultural contexts would improve our understanding of requirements for cultural adaptation [49]. Indeed, previous research showed that SEL programmes can be tailored to different cultural groups [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…A total of 1197 articles were identified through database search and hand searching. Of these, 122 articles were assessed for eligibility and 30 studies were included in the synthesis 37–66. The remaining 92 articles were excluded due to various reasons described in online supplemental S3 table.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The included studies were from: Bosnia (34, 39) (N = 2-5.13%), Brazil (42, 49) (N = 2-5.13%), Burundi (46) (51,56,57,59) (N = 4-10.26%) India (45) (N = 1-2.56%), Indonesia (48) (N = 1-2.56%), Iran (23,30,31,34,36,39,40,54) (27,58) (N = 2-5.13%), Palestine (26) (N = 1-2.56%), South Africa (55) (N = 1-2.56%), Sri Lanka (28, 47) (N = 2-5.13%), Turkey (25) (N = 1-3.85%), Uganda (50) (N = 1-2.56%). Table 1 shows the characteristics of individual included studies.…”
Section: Key Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interventions evaluated were: Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) (N = 12-27.90%) (24-27, 29-32, 34, 41, 44, 45), CBT combined with another intervention (N = 2-4.65%) (31,58), Psychoeducation (N = 13-30.23%) (28, 29,33,37,41,50,51,56,57,[59][60][61][62], Neurocognitive (N = 5-11.62%) (34,37,40,54), Narrative psychotherapy (N = 7-16.27%) (35,38,39,(46)(47)(48)55), Yoga/Meditation (N = 4-10%) (23,31,42,49). Table 2 shows the synthesis of the studies included in the systematic review.…”
Section: Key Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%