Recently, two studies aiming to validate quantitative MR imaging of the articular cartilage of the equine fetlock were published in Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound. 1, 2 Delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and T2 mapping of cartilage have the potential to quantify parameters of cartilage degeneration and I am pleased to see that these modalities are now being introduced in veterinary imaging. Such techniques however have limitations associated with spatial resolution and I am concerned that such limitations affect the accuracy of the results presented in these two investigations.In the first manuscript, 1 entitled "Validation of delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage and T2 mapping for quantifying distal metacarpus/metatarsus cartilage thickness in Thoroughbred racehorses," the authors measured cartilage thickness using MR images with a field of view of 140 mm and a matrix of 256 × 256, resulting in a pixel size of 0.547 mm. The cartilage measured on histology ranged from approximately 0.5-1 mm depending on the site. The results showed no significant difference between MR measurements and histologic measurements of cartilage where the metacarpal cartilage was not in contact with the proximal phalanx cartilage. The authors concluded that the sequences they used were accurate for cartilage thickness measurements.As illustrated by Kladny in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage in 1996, 3 the error in measurement of cartilage thickness can be calculated as the ratio of the pixel size and the thickness of the cartilage being measured. In their study measuring human knee cartilage with an average thickness of 2.5 mm with a pixel size of 0.3 mm, Kladny et al. reported an error in measurement of 12%. Applying this rule to the Carstens et al. study reveals a measurement error of 50-100% ( = 0.547/1 to 0.547/0.5). This lack of precision brings into question the validity of the conclusion.The second paper from the same authors, 2 entitled "Feasibility for mapping cartilage T1 relaxation times in the distal metacarpus3/metatarsus3 of Thoroughbred racehorses using delayed Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of cartilage (dGEMRIC): Normal cadaver study," also suffers from a lack of spatial resolution. The situation is a bit more complex than in the previous manuscript since the authors here are not investigating linear distance measurements but T1 relaxation measurements. It is therefore not possible to easily calculate an error in measurement. The authors again assess 0.5-1 mm thick cartilage regions using 0.547 mm pixels. Considering for example that the cartilage in the area of interest is 0.5 mm thick, there is only a slight chance that the whole cartilage thickness would be contained within a single pixel. It is more likely that the cartilage will be covered by 2 pixels. This means that within the 2 pixels measured, cartilage would represent less than 50% of the area (0.5/2 × 0.547). The rest of the pixel will be filled by synovial fluid or subchondral bone, with T1 v...