Feasibility of a Text Messaging Intervention to Promote Self-Management for Patients Prescribed Oral Anticancer Agents

Abstract

Texts show promise for patients with cancer who must manage their OAs. Additional research is needed prior to use in practice.

Digital health interventions to help living with cancer: A systematic review of participants' engagement and psychosocial effects

“…Digital health intervention duration varied in the different studies between 10 days and more than 6 months. In two studies, DI was used “for as long as needed.” Nine studies reported a post‐intervention follow‐up measurement …”

“…Twelve of the 24 studies were theory‐based. Theories used included Bandura's theories (DI:; Theory:), gate control theory, and goal‐setting theory . The following theories were cited as theoretical frameworks but were not in fact used in the DI discussed: the trans‐theoretical model, planned‐behavior theory, self‐determination theory, the social contextual model, and self‐regulation theory .…”

“…Study characteristics were heterogeneous, especially in terms of the DI tested and their components. Different D‐tools were used in DI such as live videoconferencing, online interactive workshops, websites including social networks for synchronous or asynchronous communication, text messages, automated voice response, PA tracking devices or Wi‐Fi weighing scales associated with an app, and apps for computer laptops, smartphones, and/or tablets . The various components of DI aimed at helping cancer patients and survivors cope better with their disease were classified into one of two categories: psychosocial components and design components.…”

“…Communication could be synchronous or asynchronous. DI could also provide virtual relationships using videoconferences (eg,) or text messaging . One virtual relationship provided to children consisted in a 3D avatar that guided the patients throughout the program using both speech and animation components …”

“…The questionnaires used to assess these variables were heterogeneous across studies. For instance, “feasibility” was assessed in terms of (1) completion or not of an intervention session, (2) attrition or adherence rate (eg,), (3) the number of assessments or text messages delivered and replied to, (4) the efficacy of the website on symptoms, symptoms distress, and quality of life, and (5) the number of eligible participants who enrolled in the study …”